2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12149-016-1111-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of left ventricular size on the accuracy of diastolic parameters derived from myocardial perfusion SPECT: comparison with tissue Doppler echocardiography

Abstract: Our data suggest that PFR, 1/3 MFR and TPFR/RR derived from SPECT are correlated with e' as the reference standard of LV diastolic function, but are overestimated in small-sized heart. LV size should be taken into consideration when interpreting these diastolic parameters.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exclusion criteria: pulmonary heart disease (10), congenital heart disease (1), rheumatic heart disease (0), cardiomyopathy and pericardial disease (2), hyperthyroidism (2), arrhythmias (5), severe anemia (0), severe hepatic and renal dysfunction (1), LVESV′ < 20 mL measured by planar MUGA (3) (because assessment of LV volume and function is less accurate in very small volume patients [ 6 , 10 ]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Exclusion criteria: pulmonary heart disease (10), congenital heart disease (1), rheumatic heart disease (0), cardiomyopathy and pericardial disease (2), hyperthyroidism (2), arrhythmias (5), severe anemia (0), severe hepatic and renal dysfunction (1), LVESV′ < 20 mL measured by planar MUGA (3) (because assessment of LV volume and function is less accurate in very small volume patients [ 6 , 10 ]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MUGA has been widely used to assess LV systolic function using several commercial software programs [ 6 ]. However, few studies on planar MUGA evaluate LV diastolic function, especially in patients with normal LV systolic function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%