1998
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.6.1737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Abstract: Three experiments investigated the influence of unperceived events on response activation. Masked primers were presented before a target. On compatible trials, primes and targets were identical; on incompatible trials, opposite responses were assigned to them. Forced-choice performance indicated that prime identification was prevented by the masking procedure, but overt performance and motor activation as mirrored by the lateralized readiness potential (LRP) were systematically influenced by the prime. The dir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

58
619
14
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 375 publications
(695 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
58
619
14
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Henderson et al (2009) reported two pilot studies demonstrating that the word flu is highly associated with the common cold, unambiguous when spelled, and used synonymously with the "common cold' in everyday speech. The experimental prime consisted of the word 'FLU', presented subliminally, with a presentation time of 17ms (Eimer & Schlaghecken, 1998;Henderson et al, 2009). In the control condition, participants were presented with the stimulus 'XXX' so that the length of the subliminal stimulus was matched in the experimental and control groups.…”
Section: Materials and Equipment The Presentation Of The Subliminal mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Henderson et al (2009) reported two pilot studies demonstrating that the word flu is highly associated with the common cold, unambiguous when spelled, and used synonymously with the "common cold' in everyday speech. The experimental prime consisted of the word 'FLU', presented subliminally, with a presentation time of 17ms (Eimer & Schlaghecken, 1998;Henderson et al, 2009). In the control condition, participants were presented with the stimulus 'XXX' so that the length of the subliminal stimulus was matched in the experimental and control groups.…”
Section: Materials and Equipment The Presentation Of The Subliminal mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many convincing demonstrations that a masked visual stimulus, which is presented too brie¯y to be consciously seen, can nevertheless be processed at various sub-semantic levels. Recent examples include visual word identi®cation (Ferrand, Grainger, & Segui, 1994;Forster, 1999), processing of facial emotions (Whalen et al, 1998), and stimulus±response associations (Eimer & Schlaghecken, 1998;Neumann & Klotz, 1994). Several demonstrations of unconscious access to the meaning of masked primes have also been put forward (Draine & Greenwald, 1998;Dell'Acqua & Grainger, 1999;Greenwald, 1996;Luck, Vogel, & Shapiro, 1996;Marcel, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, however, an alternative non-semantic interpretation of masked priming experiments has been gaining strength (Abrams & Greenwald, in press;Damian, in press;Eimer & Schlaghecken, 1998;Neumann & Klotz, 1994). Abrams and Greenwald asked subjects to evaluate the valence of consciously seen targets words as positive or negative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, Dehaene et al claimed to have demonstrated that the processing of subliminally presented primes extends all the way down to include the motor system. Subsequently, several researchers have replicated the ERP findings in a range of masked priming paradigms (Eimer & Schlaghecken, 1998;Leuthold & Kopp, 1998;Praamstra & Seiss, 2005).Although the neurophysiological effects establish the extent of processing of masked primes, these findings do not necessarily reveal the reason for longer response latencies in the incongruent condition. For example, it could be argued that responses are selected at a premotor (amodal) level of representation (Botvinick, Matthew Finkbeiner, Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Alfonso Caramazza, Department of Psychology, Harvard University, and Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%