2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of nonlinear failure criterion on the three-dimensional stability analysis of uniform slopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Method. Since the nonlinear PL failure criterion was firstly proposed by Zhang & Chen [9] to express the failure envelopes of cohesive soils, numerous researchers have applied this nonlinear criterion into the slope stability analysis [11,[14][15][16][17]. For the PL failure criterion, the shear stress on the slope slip surface is expressed in the form of normal stress , as follows:…”
Section: Pl Strength Criterion and Tangentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Method. Since the nonlinear PL failure criterion was firstly proposed by Zhang & Chen [9] to express the failure envelopes of cohesive soils, numerous researchers have applied this nonlinear criterion into the slope stability analysis [11,[14][15][16][17]. For the PL failure criterion, the shear stress on the slope slip surface is expressed in the form of normal stress , as follows:…”
Section: Pl Strength Criterion and Tangentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To implement the use of nonlinear strength criteria for slope engineering, the tangential method was originally proposed by Drescher & Christopoulos [29] to conduct the limit analysis of slope stability. Then, many researchers employed the proposed tangential method to evaluate the slope safety in the 2D or 3D conditions [11,[14][15][16][17]28]. Their studies could demonstrate the validity of stability results obtained from the tangential method for slope engineering applications.…”
Section: Pl Strength Criterion and Tangentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations