2013
DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2012.749201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of operational parameters on cadmium removal from aqueous solutions by electrochemical coagulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, adjusting the initial pH to 3 decreased COD about 25 % from 7150 to 5256. This was also demonstrated in other research (Aoudj et al 2010;Bayar et al 2013) that reported that the treatment efficiency was very poor either at low or high pH. The optimal value is revealed to be pH 6.…”
Section: Effect Of Initial Phsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, adjusting the initial pH to 3 decreased COD about 25 % from 7150 to 5256. This was also demonstrated in other research (Aoudj et al 2010;Bayar et al 2013) that reported that the treatment efficiency was very poor either at low or high pH. The optimal value is revealed to be pH 6.…”
Section: Effect Of Initial Phsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…An increase in the time of electrolysis from 10 to 60 min yields an increase in the dye removal efficiency from 52.5 to 98.28 %. Also, Bayar et al (2013) found that the best removal efficiency was obtained under the conditions of 180-min electrolysis time, wastewater with constant pH of 6. There was no remarkable result at pH 3 or levels higher than 7.…”
Section: Effect Of Treatment Timementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Water is used in daily activities, which in turn increases the need for efficient wastewater treatment facilities. Due to rapid industrialization, a large quantity of polluted water is generated every year by different industries such as textile (Zheng et al 2012), leather (Natarajan et al 2013), pharmaceutical (Farhadi et al 2012;Boroski et al 2009), heavy metal (Al Aji et al 2012), cadmium removal (Bayar et al 2013;Yilmaz et al 2012), arsenic (Can et al 2012(Can et al , 2014, dairy processing (Idris et al 2012), paint (Singh et al 2015), petroleum (Zhou et al 2012), pulp and paper (Bengtsson et al 2008;Pokhrel and Viraraghavan 2004), distillery (Lucas et al 2009), fertilizer (Srivastava et al 1996), tannery (Houshyar et al 2012), landfill (Wu et al 2011), bakers yeast (Gengec et al 2012), food processing (Pocostales et al 2012), biodiesel (Ngamlerdpokin et al 2011) and olive packaging industries (García-García et al 2011;Kul et al 2015), Pistachio processing industry Fil et al 2014), etc. The pulp and paper industry is a large consumer of fresh water and an important source of wastewater (Ashrafi et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional treatment technologies for heavy metals mainly include chemical precipitation [8], ionexchange [9], adsorption [10], membrane [11], flotation [12], coagulation-flocculation [13], and electrochemical methods [14]. Among these, adsorption process is featured by its easy setup, simple operation, low maintenance cost, and many types of readily accessible costeffective adsorbents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%