2019
DOI: 10.3390/nano9121702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Preparation Method on the Physicochemical Properties of Cationic Nanocellulose and Starch Nanocomposites

Abstract: Nanocellulose (NC) has attracted attention in recent years for the advantages offered by its unique characteristics. In this study, the effects of the preparation method on the properties of starch films were investigated by preparing NC from cationic-modified microcrystalline cellulose (MD-MCC) using three methods: Acid hydrolysis (AH), high-pressure homogenization (HH), and high-intensity ultrasonication (US). When MD-MCC was used as the starting material, the yield of NC dramatically increased compared to t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sartori and Menegalli (2016) determined that producing CNFs from banana peels at lower reaction concentrations resulted in better reinforcing of banana starch films (Table 2, entry 46) and therefore, better mechanical and barrier properties. Han et al (2019) examined the effect of NCs made from CHPTAC-modified microcrystalline cellulose. In this study, three standard methods of NC production were screened-acid hydrolysis, ultrasonication, or high-pressure homogenization-to determine which method produced NCs capable of reinforcing starch films the most effectively.…”
Section: Cellulose As An Additivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sartori and Menegalli (2016) determined that producing CNFs from banana peels at lower reaction concentrations resulted in better reinforcing of banana starch films (Table 2, entry 46) and therefore, better mechanical and barrier properties. Han et al (2019) examined the effect of NCs made from CHPTAC-modified microcrystalline cellulose. In this study, three standard methods of NC production were screened-acid hydrolysis, ultrasonication, or high-pressure homogenization-to determine which method produced NCs capable of reinforcing starch films the most effectively.…”
Section: Cellulose As An Additivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Han et al. (2019) examined the effect of NCs made from CHPTAC‐modified microcrystalline cellulose. In this study, three standard methods of NC production were screened–acid hydrolysis, ultrasonication, or high‐pressure homogenization–to determine which method produced NCs capable of reinforcing starch films the most effectively.…”
Section: Films With Enhanced Mechanical and Barrier Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This peak would be influenced mainly by the intensity of S (Figure 8a), whose energy contribution was 2804.90 J/g. It would be mainly due to the energy contribution of S (9.66 J/g) and G [25] since the starch when exceeding 60 • C, presents an irreversible swelling, achieving the destructuring of its granules, and a highly stable glassy structure, with strong molecular movement in transition to melting [80,96,97]. It establishes strong bonds due to the hydroxyl groups [27,37,39], which is why this material is widely used in the production of edible films [24,29,80].…”
Section: Thermal Analysis Of Raw Materials and Filmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors proved that such an interesting cellulosic derivative, which exhibited very low toxicity, is considered as a good candidate as an immunomodulator and as vaccine nano-adjuvants. In another work, Han et al investigated the physicochemical properties of cationic nanocellulose (cationic NC) and starch nanocomposites [ 20 ]. The authors prepared cationic NC from cationic-modified microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) using different approaches, i.e., acid hydrolysis, high-pressure homogenization, and high-intensity ultrasonication.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%