2022
DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2022.2026302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of religiosity and travel desire on COVID-19 vaccination intentions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This path obtained a CR score of 18.20, indicating that H5 was accepted. This finding was in line with the results of previous studies (Aydin et al , 2021; Chu and Liu, 2021; Ekinci et al , 2022; Fridman et al , 2021; Kesgin et al , 2022; Paul et al , 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This path obtained a CR score of 18.20, indicating that H5 was accepted. This finding was in line with the results of previous studies (Aydin et al , 2021; Chu and Liu, 2021; Ekinci et al , 2022; Fridman et al , 2021; Kesgin et al , 2022; Paul et al , 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This influence may be based on community members' interactions with the health system infrastructure and personnel or physical side effects from vaccination and can form the basis of positive or negative social norms about vaccination in a given geographical context (Ward and Raude, 2014). Several research studies have examined the relationship between subjective norms and vaccination intention (Bukhari et al, 2020;Ekinci et al, 2022;Fan et al, 2021;Kesgin et al, 2022), but no research has examined whether subjective norms affect attitudes toward receiving a particular vaccine brand. Therefore, based on the preceding discussion, this study proposes that: H4.…”
Section: Electronic Word-of-mouthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This influence may be based on community members' interactions with the health system infrastructure and personnel or physical side effects of vaccination and can form the basis of positive or negative social norms about vaccination in a given geographical context (Ward and Raude, 2014). Several research studies have examined the relationship between subjective norms and vaccination intention (Bukhari et al, 2020;Ekinci et al, 2022;Fan et al, 2021;Kesgin et al, 2022), but no research has examined whether subjective norms affect attitudes toward receiving a particular vaccine brand. Therefore, based on the preceding discussion, this study proposes that: H4.…”
Section: Electronic Word Of Mouthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some influencing factors have indirect effects on tourism intention through mediating variables, including the positive effects of trust and solidarity on willingness to support a destination , trust in government (Quintal et al, 2022), and health risk perception (Su et al, 2022). The vaccination intention and travel intention are also mutually influenced (Ekinci et al, 2022;Gursoy et al, 2021;Kesgin et al, 2022). People who were more severely influenced by the pandemic show a relatively higher willingness to travel (Boto-Garcia & Leoni, 2021). Cluster #1 is labeled as domestic tourism.…”
Section: Abstract Cluster Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%