2005
DOI: 10.6009/jjrt.kj00003943075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Slice Thickness and Matrix Size on MRI for Signal Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the pooled values of the group with a scanning slice thickness of 3 mm indicated that reducing the scanning slice thickness of MRI may improve the diagnostic accuracy of cystic renal masses, and the diagnostic accuracy could exceed that of CEUS. However, some studies revealed that thin slices can increase the detection of the signal but decrease the signal-to-noise ratio (36). Therefore, the appropriate MRI slice thickness for the diagnosis of cystic renal masses still needs further exploration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the pooled values of the group with a scanning slice thickness of 3 mm indicated that reducing the scanning slice thickness of MRI may improve the diagnostic accuracy of cystic renal masses, and the diagnostic accuracy could exceed that of CEUS. However, some studies revealed that thin slices can increase the detection of the signal but decrease the signal-to-noise ratio (36). Therefore, the appropriate MRI slice thickness for the diagnosis of cystic renal masses still needs further exploration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical practice, 3 mm slice thickness MRI is routinely used 12 14 . However, the thickened slices lead to the partial volume averaging effect 15 , 16 , which may result in insufficient delineation of the tumour and adjacent anatomical structures. Reducing the slice thickness has been difficult because it decreases signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), degrades image quality 17 , and decreases diagnostic accuracy 18 , 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matrix size should be increased to improve image resolution [36], and the field of view should be increased to reduce the presence of aliasing artifacts [37]. However, a larger matrix size results in decreased signal-to-noise ratio and a longer scan time [36].…”
Section: Patient Preparation and Technical Tipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matrix size should be increased to improve image resolution [36], and the field of view should be increased to reduce the presence of aliasing artifacts [37]. However, a larger matrix size results in decreased signal-to-noise ratio and a longer scan time [36]. Therefore, the optimal matrix size should be determined in each institute, and the scan time should be approximately 5 min per MRI sequence.…”
Section: Patient Preparation and Technical Tipsmentioning
confidence: 99%