2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41534-021-00491-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of surface treatments on flux tunable transmon qubits

Abstract: One of the main limitations in state-of-the art solid-state quantum processors is qubit decoherence and relaxation due to noise from adsorbates on surfaces, impurities at interfaces, and material defects. For the field to advance towards full fault-tolerant quantum computing, a better understanding of these microscopic noise sources is therefore needed. Here, we use an ultra-high vacuum package to study the impact of vacuum loading, UV-light exposure, and ion irradiation treatments on relaxation and coherence … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given an E J /E C -ratio of 27.3 and a corresponding residual charge dispersion of ε 0 = 23 kHz, our findings are compatible with the presence of quasiparticles but do not exclude two-level fluctuators as the source of the observed fluctuations. The measured coherence figures are on par with the best in literature and show that our UHV-package can be used to measure complex quantum device chips and study a variety of surface treatments 14 .…”
Section: Qubit Measurementssupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given an E J /E C -ratio of 27.3 and a corresponding residual charge dispersion of ε 0 = 23 kHz, our findings are compatible with the presence of quasiparticles but do not exclude two-level fluctuators as the source of the observed fluctuations. The measured coherence figures are on par with the best in literature and show that our UHV-package can be used to measure complex quantum device chips and study a variety of surface treatments 14 .…”
Section: Qubit Measurementssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Measurements on high-coherence flux tunable qubits (T 1 = 84.3 µs and T echo 2 = 134.4 µs) demonstrate that the UHV package is capable of assessing coherence figures of merit as a function of treatment parameters for complex multi-qubit chips. This functionality is unique in the field and will be put to use in future work 14 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, a large number of works have used this approach with varying degrees of success. Some recent examples include correlating in situ treatments with qubit coherence times [39,40], 1/f flux noise [21] in superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) and resonator loss and noise [25,41]. We refer to a recent review [1] for a more extensive overview of this approach.…”
Section: Understanding Tls Ensembles From Device Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But for qubits operating at millikelvin temperatures, microwave-frequency loss has become an overarching criterion for building processors with sufficient coherence to entangle more than a few qubits 1 . The stringency of this requirement has drawn qubit fabrication into the domain of surface science, since the electromagnetic fields storing information interact with the interface between the solid state and atmosphere to a degree not usually met with in superconducting or conventional information processing devices [9][10][11][12] . Among superconductors being pursued for favorable surface properties 13 , tantalum shares desirable traits with niobium but has a distinct surface chemistry 14,15 , affording new possibilities for engineering low-loss interfaces with the substrate and atmosphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%