2011
DOI: 10.1021/es2000744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of ZnO Nanoparticles on Wastewater Biological Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal

Abstract: With the increasing utilization of nanomaterials, zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) have been reported to induce adverse effects on human health and aquatic organisms. However, the potential impacts of ZnO NPs on wastewater nitrogen and phosphorus removal with an activated sludge process are unknown. In this paper, short-term exposure experiments were conducted to determine whether ZnO NPs caused adverse impacts on biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal in the unacclimated anaerobic-low dissolved oxygen s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
150
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 376 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
150
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2) suggest that the reduction in nitrogen removal efficiency can be attributed to the inhibitory effects of the CeO 2 NPs on the ammonia oxidation and denitrification phases, rather than the process of nitrite to nitrate. Similar conclusions were also drawn by Zheng et al (2011aZheng et al ( , 2011b, who studied the influences of different kinds of NPs on nitrogen removal in activated sludge systems. Furthermore, due to the complex and special structure of biofilm, the denitrifying bacteria that live deeper in the anoxic biofilm layer with carbon storage would stimulate the SND process (Yang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Effects Of Ceo 2 Nps On Biological Nitrogen Removal Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2) suggest that the reduction in nitrogen removal efficiency can be attributed to the inhibitory effects of the CeO 2 NPs on the ammonia oxidation and denitrification phases, rather than the process of nitrite to nitrate. Similar conclusions were also drawn by Zheng et al (2011aZheng et al ( , 2011b, who studied the influences of different kinds of NPs on nitrogen removal in activated sludge systems. Furthermore, due to the complex and special structure of biofilm, the denitrifying bacteria that live deeper in the anoxic biofilm layer with carbon storage would stimulate the SND process (Yang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Effects Of Ceo 2 Nps On Biological Nitrogen Removal Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In contrast, the structure of the LB-EPS coating on the outside of sludge particles would permit the NPs to penetrate the deeper layers of the biofilm, and thus, the protective capacity is limited under high concentrations (Hou et al, 2015;Ma et al, 2013). Thus, in this study, the reason for the inhibited denitrification in the SBBR may not have been caused by the denitrifying bacteria, in seeming contradiction to the inhibition of NPs in activated sludge systems (Zheng et al, 2011b).…”
Section: Viability Of the Bacteria Before And After The Exposurementioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zheng et al proved that zinc oxide NPs had adverse influence on biological processes of nitrogen removal as well as on denitrifying bacteria and microorganisms responsible for phosphorus elimination called PAO (polyphosphate accumulating organisms). Nitrogen removal efficiency decreased from 81.5% to 75.6% and 70.8%, when concentrations of nano-ZnO equaled 10 mg/l and 50 mg/l, respectively [17]. These results indicate that zinc oxide NPs lead to the disruption of the activated sludge treatment process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In the literature there are also a few reports about influence NPs on biological processes of nitrogen and phosphorus removal as well as on denitrifying bacteria and microorganisms responsible for phosphorus elimination, the so-called PAO (polyphosphate accumulating organisms). Zheng et al (2011) showed that, nano-ZnO can induce serious trouble in self-purification of water as well as in biological wastewater treatment [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%