2019
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab for Heavily Pretreated Patients With Advanced, Metastatic Adenocarcinoma or Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus

Abstract: IMPORTANCE Effective treatment options are limited for patients with advanced, metastatic esophageal cancer progressing after 2 or more lines of systemic therapy. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab for patients with advanced, metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) or advanced, metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction that progressed after 2 or more lines of systemic therapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
357
3
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 412 publications
(374 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
11
357
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Two of the most recently published KEYNOTE trials (KEYNOTE-180 and KEYNOTE-181) examined the efficacy of pembrolizumab in treating PD-L1-positive esophageal or EGJ tumors defined as having a CPS $10. 37,151 This is in contrast to previous studies that have defined PD-L1positive tumors as having a CPS $1. In the phase II single-arm KEYNOTE-180 trial, which evaluated pembrolizumab monotherapy in 121 patients with progressive disease after $2 prior lines of therapy, the objective response rate was 9.9% (95% CI, 5.2%-16.7%) among all patients, 5.2% (95% CI, 1.1%-14.4%) among patients with adenocarcinoma (n558), and 13.8% (95% CI, 6.1%-25.4%) among patients with PD-L1-positive tumors (n558).…”
Section: Pembrolizumabmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Two of the most recently published KEYNOTE trials (KEYNOTE-180 and KEYNOTE-181) examined the efficacy of pembrolizumab in treating PD-L1-positive esophageal or EGJ tumors defined as having a CPS $10. 37,151 This is in contrast to previous studies that have defined PD-L1positive tumors as having a CPS $1. In the phase II single-arm KEYNOTE-180 trial, which evaluated pembrolizumab monotherapy in 121 patients with progressive disease after $2 prior lines of therapy, the objective response rate was 9.9% (95% CI, 5.2%-16.7%) among all patients, 5.2% (95% CI, 1.1%-14.4%) among patients with adenocarcinoma (n558), and 13.8% (95% CI, 6.1%-25.4%) among patients with PD-L1-positive tumors (n558).…”
Section: Pembrolizumabmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Tumoral PD-L1 expression has been shown to be a predictive marker for response to anti-PD-1 targeted therapies. However, some PD-L1positive patients of esophageal cancer did not benefit from such therapies, while some patients lack of PD-L1 still showed clinical response [10,12], implying that other molecular interacts with PD-1 such as PD-L2 may be important for immunotherapy efficacy in ESCC. In prostate cancer, PD-L2 was more highly expressed than PD-L1 and overwhelmingly correlated with immune- Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, accumulating results suggest that the interaction between mutant cells and immune cells in tissue microenvironment directly influences and even determines the development of cancer [8,9]. Importantly, immunotherapies that target tumor microenvironment instead of tumor intrinsic cells have revealed remarkable efficacy in multiple cancer types, shedding light on the possible treatment of ESCC [10][11][12]. However, the sophisticated immune responses and their biological significance during ESCC carcinogenesis is still unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumors with a higher density of infiltrating immune cells, called hot tumors, are more responsive to ICI than cold tumors with a lower density of infiltrating immune cells 20,21 . In ESCC, the usability of PD‐L1 expression as a biomarker of ICI sensitivity remains controversial 9,33 . However, in other cancers, several studies have reported the predictive value of ICI sensitivity markers, such as tumoral PD‐L1 expression, 34 hot tumor phenotype, 20,21 tumor mutation burden 35 and IFN‐γ gene signature 36,37 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%