2017
DOI: 10.1177/1753465817708950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of direct hemoperfusion using polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column (PMX-DHP) in rapidly progressive interstitial pneumonias: results of a historical control study and a review of previous studies

Abstract: Background:Direct hemoperfusion using polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column (PMX-DHP) therapy has been approved for sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome, but its efficacy for other rapidly progressive interstitial pneumonias (RPIPs) is unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of PMX-DHP therapy for acute respiratory failure in patients with RPIPs, when compared with a historical control receiving conventional treatment without PMX-DHP.Methods:This study comprised 77 patien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Itchyasu reported that among patients with AE-IPF, there was no difference in 3 month survival between PMX-DHP (40%) and control group (42.9%). However, when all types of IIP were included in the analysis, survival was better in the PMX-DHP group (Ichiyasu et al, 2017). Similarly, in the study by Furusawa et al, among the patients with AE-IPF, there was no difference in overall survival between the PMX-DHP (33%) and the control group (50%) (Furusawa et al, 2017).…”
Section: Sivelestatmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Itchyasu reported that among patients with AE-IPF, there was no difference in 3 month survival between PMX-DHP (40%) and control group (42.9%). However, when all types of IIP were included in the analysis, survival was better in the PMX-DHP group (Ichiyasu et al, 2017). Similarly, in the study by Furusawa et al, among the patients with AE-IPF, there was no difference in overall survival between the PMX-DHP (33%) and the control group (50%) (Furusawa et al, 2017).…”
Section: Sivelestatmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The other two studies include various types of interstitial pneumonias. Furthermore, in addition to corticosteroids, other agents, such as CTX, CsA, tacrolimus, sivelestat or anticoagulants, were administered during the study period (Furusawa et al, 2017;Ichiyasu et al, 2017). Itchyasu reported that among patients with AE-IPF, there was no difference in 3 month survival between PMX-DHP (40%) and control group (42.9%).…”
Section: Sivelestatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although one study (Ikeda et al 34 ) also described the time at treatment since admission, it was not clearly reported. An additional report (Ichiyasu et al 31 ) described the time at PMX-DHP treatment since the diagnosis of the disease, which ranged from 0 to 48 days. Takada et al 29 mentioned a delay in instituting the PMX-DHP treatment after steroid pulse therapy, which was 0 in six patients and 2–6 days in seven patients (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct hemoperfusion using polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column (PMX-DHP) is a blood purification therapy used to treat septic shock, 4 and acute respiratory diseases such as rapidly progressing interstitial pneumonia 5 and acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. 6 COVID-19 pneumonia can also take the form of interstitial changes, 7 but few reports are available on the use of PMX-DHP therapy in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%