2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.0001-5172.2004.00425.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of the A‐line™ AEP monitor as a tool for predicting successful insertion of a laryngeal mask during sevoflurane anesthesia

Abstract: AAI indicates the level of depth of anesthesia necessary for acceptable laryngeal mask insertion conditions. End-expiratory sevoflurane concentration was the better predictor.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is of interest since, in contrast to the present study, AAI monitoring has previously been shown to predict movement in response to painful stimulus [ 23 ]. Prediction of patient movement, however, is an as yet largely unmet demand made of exclusively EEG-based depth-of-anesthesia monitoring devices (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This finding is of interest since, in contrast to the present study, AAI monitoring has previously been shown to predict movement in response to painful stimulus [ 23 ]. Prediction of patient movement, however, is an as yet largely unmet demand made of exclusively EEG-based depth-of-anesthesia monitoring devices (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…As FE 0 sevoflurane appeared to correlate more closely with LMA insertion conditions, 7 we also performed a post hoc analysis of FE 0 sevoflurane as a predictor for intubation conditions, although this was not part of the original protocol. Great care should be taken when evaluating these data as the investigator was not blinded with regard to the FE 0 sevoflurane .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A laryngeal mask airway was inserted, and then the sevoflurane turned off until the end‐tidal concentration fell to 2%. The sevoflurane was then re‐instituted to maintain the end‐tidal concentration at 2% throughout the measurement period . After a further stabilisation period of 5–10 min, the second set of signal recordings took place.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%