1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0272-7757(97)00048-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency differences of finnish senior secondary schools: An application of DEA and Tobit analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
81
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
81
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study we use the customary two-stage procedure for the factor analysis of efficiency (Chilingerian, 1995;Kirjavainen and Loikkanen, 1998 First, inequality in the development between urban and rural areas and the urbanization level within a province in China are two important factors which can influence efficiency. China is committed to a long-term plan of building a moderately well off society for all citizens.…”
Section: Factor Analysis Of Technical Efficiency: Tobit Model Of Inefmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we use the customary two-stage procedure for the factor analysis of efficiency (Chilingerian, 1995;Kirjavainen and Loikkanen, 1998 First, inequality in the development between urban and rural areas and the urbanization level within a province in China are two important factors which can influence efficiency. China is committed to a long-term plan of building a moderately well off society for all citizens.…”
Section: Factor Analysis Of Technical Efficiency: Tobit Model Of Inefmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples are Barro (2001), Hanushek and Kimko (2000), Hanushek and Luque (2003) and Kirjavainen and Loikkanen (1998).…”
Section: Non-discretionary Inputs and Bootstrapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. Capital stock, the K value is calculated by using the Goldsmith (1951) perpetual inventory method [35]. 3.…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%