2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient methodology for probabilistic analysis of consolidation considering spatial variability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
8
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Different geometrical dimensions of the 3D soil domain and correlation lengths are considered and compared with respect to the corresponding solid problem without considering the pore pressure. The qualitative and quantitative results obtained in the present work agree with the published work in the field [5,9,21,22,29,34,37,46] 2 Formulation of the dynamic soil-pore-fluid interaction…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different geometrical dimensions of the 3D soil domain and correlation lengths are considered and compared with respect to the corresponding solid problem without considering the pore pressure. The qualitative and quantitative results obtained in the present work agree with the published work in the field [5,9,21,22,29,34,37,46] 2 Formulation of the dynamic soil-pore-fluid interaction…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Several investigations have studied the influence of the input variability, such as the Young modulus and the permeability on the actual displacements, the degree of consolidation and the stress distribution in the soil domain. Kim et al [29], Huang et al [22], Bong and Stuedlein [9], Ronold [46] and Houmadi et al [21]. In the stochastic finite element method there are two ways of describing the spatial distribution of the input stochastic variables [5, 8, 12, 20, 24, 35, 37-39, 42, 49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Random fields have been successfully used to model spatially correlated geotechnical properties during the last several decades (e.g., Vanmarcke 1977;Vanmarcke et al 1986;Phoon and Kulhawy 1999;Fenton and Griffiths 2008;Bong and Stuedlein 2018;Wang et al 2018;Zhao and Wang 2018b). In this study, soil property profiles from a wide variety of statistically homogenous and stationary soil layers are simulated using random fields.…”
Section: Random Field Simulation Of Soil Property Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por consiguiente, es necesario caracterizar los suelos mediante PDF apropiadas que describan dicha variabilidad para cada uno de sus parámetros [15]. Lo anterior se debe a que no siempre la distribución de datos es uniforme y el valor medio de los mismos coincide con la mediana.…”
Section: Excelenteunclassified
“…Huang et al [14] combinaron la teoría de consolidación de Biot con el método aleatorio de elementos finitos y establecieron un estudio paramétrico entre el coeficiente de compresibilidad del volumen (m v ) y la permeabilidad del suelo (k) como variables aleatorias que siguen una distribución lognormal, sus resultados permitieron evaluar el fenómeno de consolidación en depósitos de suelo con propiedades espacialmente variables en espacios unidimensionales (1D) y bidimensionales (2D). Bong y Stuedlein [15] abordaron dos métodos para el análisis probabilístico del fenómeno de consolidación, el método confiabilidad de primer orden (FORM) y método de superficie de respuesta estocástica (SRSM); en dichos métodos se tuvo en cuenta la variabilidad espacial del coeficiente de consolidación (Cv) y una técnica para calcular una parámetro Cv equivalente para la consolidación vertical y radial combinada.…”
unclassified