2020
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2020.3003901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Sequential Detection of Carrier Frequency Offset and Primary Synchronization Signal for 5G NR Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When Carrier Frequency Offsets (CFOs) exceed subcarrier spacing then an autocorrelation based algorithm is used to estimate FFOs and IFOs, which can be estimated by calculating shifts of the received synchronization signal. Authors in [16] have proposed the detection of IFO and Sector ID sequentially without prior knowledge of PSS for 5G NR. This scheme provides low complexity at the cost of slight performance degradation.…”
Section: Related Work 21 Conventional Integer Frequency Offsets (Ifos) Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When Carrier Frequency Offsets (CFOs) exceed subcarrier spacing then an autocorrelation based algorithm is used to estimate FFOs and IFOs, which can be estimated by calculating shifts of the received synchronization signal. Authors in [16] have proposed the detection of IFO and Sector ID sequentially without prior knowledge of PSS for 5G NR. This scheme provides low complexity at the cost of slight performance degradation.…”
Section: Related Work 21 Conventional Integer Frequency Offsets (Ifos) Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional method to estimate IFO and sector ID is presented in [13] and [16] for LTE and 5G system model. In [13], Maximum Likelihood estimation method is employed to estimate IFO and to detect PSS.…”
Section: Conventional Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To evaluate the computational complexity of the proposed algorithm, we compare its number of complex multiplication and complex addition with it of the conventional algorithm. For a fair comparison, one complex multiplication and one complex addition are considered six and two floating point operations (flops), respectively [19]. We mainly consider the flops needed for each synchronization point…”
Section: E Computational Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the auto-correlation algorithm cannot get the cell ID sector (2) ID N after calculating the synchronization position. Reference [18]- [19] proposed the joint detection algorithm of PSS and integer frequency offset (IFO). Although the complexity of the proposed algorithm is reduced, it causes a certain degree of performance loss and is not robust in the case of large carrier frequency offset (CFO).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%