2019
DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmz010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Egg Consumption and Risk of Upper Aero-Digestive Tract Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Abstract: Limited data are available that summarize the relation between egg intake and the risk of upper aero-digestive tract (UADT) cancers. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the association between egg intake and the risk of UADT cancers. Medline/PubMed, ISI web of knowledge, EMBASE, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched using relevant keywords. Observational studies conducted on humans investigating the association between egg consumption and the risk of UADT cancers were inclu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Systematic review and meta-analysis can be classified into dietary supplements [15][16][17][18][19] and food groups/dietary patterns [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. For instance, cinnamon may be helpful in reducing the serum levels of glucose with no changes in other glycemic parameters and anthropometric indices in patients with diabetes.…”
Section: Findings Of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systematic review and meta-analysis can be classified into dietary supplements [15][16][17][18][19] and food groups/dietary patterns [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. For instance, cinnamon may be helpful in reducing the serum levels of glucose with no changes in other glycemic parameters and anthropometric indices in patients with diabetes.…”
Section: Findings Of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirteen (44.8%) of the 29 included reviews were conducted in China (5,6,8,(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26), 6 in the USA (10,(27)(28)(29)(30)(31), three in Iran (32)(33)(34), and 1 each in France (35), the Netherlands (36), Japan (9), Australia (7), Sweden (37), Canada (38) and Singapore (39). Twenty-six reviews were quantitative analyses and the remaining three (10,35,38) were qualitative studies.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nine reviews (5,6,8,21,24,31,34,35,39) included less than ten original studies. Most (n=21) reviews (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)17,(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)33,37) had a total sample of more than 10,000 participants.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations