2009
DOI: 10.1007/s12523-010-0031-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Einleitung — Der Generations and Gender Survey in Deutschland: Zielsetzung, Verortung, Einschränkungen und Potenziale

Abstract: Datenquelle. Beim GGS handelt es sich um eine international vergleichend angelegte Datenquelle. Beim GGS handelt es sich um eine international vergleichend angelegte Datenquelle. Beim GGS handelt es sich um eine international vergleichend angelegte Datenquelle. Beim GGS handelt es sich um eine international vergleichend angelegte Paneluntersuchung, mit der demografische Entwicklungen auf Basis individueller HandPaneluntersuchung, mit der demografische Entwicklungen auf Basis individueller HandPaneluntersuchung… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the GGS does not appear to provide reliable information on fertility trends in Germany at all (for a detailed discussion of this see Naderi et al 2009;. 16 For the microcensus and the pension registers, no confidence bounds are provided because of the large sample size.…”
Section: Total Number Of Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, the GGS does not appear to provide reliable information on fertility trends in Germany at all (for a detailed discussion of this see Naderi et al 2009;. 16 For the microcensus and the pension registers, no confidence bounds are provided because of the large sample size.…”
Section: Total Number Of Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This subsample was observed in 2006(Ruckdeschel et al 2006). However, an evaluation of the German GGS has been undertaken and major flaws in the fertility histories have been diagnosedNaderi et al 2009). The German Life History Survey (GLHS) provides complete fertility histories of female and male respondents for selected birth cohorts.A very recent and large data set is a study conducted by the Institute for Employment Research entitled 'Arbeiten und Leben im Wandel' (ALWA).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AR and PMD measures, as well as their associated variants, require weights reflecting the suitability of male and female age groups to each other. These weights were specified by analysing several German surveys that include detailed information about couple relationships: the German Family Survey (all waves, Bien & Marbach, ), the Generations and Gender Survey (all waves, German samples, Naderi, Dorbritz, & Ruckdeschel, ), the Panel Analysis of Intimate Relationships and Family Dynamics (waves 1 to 3, Huinink et al, ), the German Aging Survey (waves 1 to 3, Engstler & Schmiade, ), the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (all waves, German sample, Börsch‐Supan, Brandt, Howard, & Weber, ), and the German Socio‐economic Panel (GSOEP; Haisken‐DeNew & Frick, ). Using these surveys, we computed probabilities of age constellations in newly formed couple relationships (in detail Eckhard et al, : 16–44).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This subsample was observed in 2006 (Ruckdeschel et al 2006). An evaluation of the German GGS has been undertaken and major fl aws in the fertility histories have been diagnosed (Kreyenfeld et al 2010a;Naderi et al 2009). The German Life History Survey (GLHS) provides complete fertility histories of female and male respondents for selected birth cohorts (Mayer 2006).…”
Section: Social Science Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the Mikrozensus follows the trend suggested by the vital statistics fairly well, this is not the case for the other surveys. Particularly disturbing are the results for the German GGS which give a wrong impression of the overall trends in fertility (for a detailed discussion see also Naderi et al 2009;Kreyenfeld et al 2010a). It is also worth noting that the "family bias" is more pronounced in the pairfam, the GGS and the DJI-Family Survey, while the bias does not seem as strong in the (weighted) SOEP-data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%