El análisis modal de fallos y efectos (AMFE) ayuda a aumentar la seguridad en radioterapia

Govindarajan, Rajaram; Molero, J.; Tuset, V.; Arellano, Antonio; Ballester, R.; Cardenal, Juan; Caro, M.; Fernández, Jacinto; Jové, Josep; Luguera, E.; Melero, Alejandro; Puertas, M.D.M.; Sal, Rosa; Sánchez, José Luis; Vidal, A; Feliú, Evarist

doi:10.1016/s1134-282x(07)71238-1

Cited by 13 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Mediante este mé todo se podían analizar los fallos de un proceso y, de este modo, prevenir o minimizar sus efectos 14,15 . En primer lugar, se definieron las actividades del programa de TPH, se identificaron los riesgos asociados a estas actividades y se les dio una puntuació n en funció n de la gravedad del fallo y de la probabilidad de que ocurriera.…”

Section: Resultsunclassified

Análisis de la implantación de la acreditación del Joint Acreditation Committee of the International Society for Cellular Therapy and European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation en un programa clínico de trasplante de progenitores hematopoyéticos

et al. 2011

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultsunclassified

Análisis de la implantación de la acreditación del Joint Acreditation Committee of the International Society for Cellular Therapy and European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation en un programa clínico de trasplante de progenitores hematopoyéticos

et al. 2011

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…For example, Cañada Dorado et al 4 described the improvement in the safety of the management of patients with oral anticoagulant therapy in primary care. Govindarajan et al 6 used the FMEA methodology as a result of an adverse event detected at the radiotherapy treatment unit. Collins et al 7 assessed the severity and probability of failures in the inpatient oral chemotherapy order, review, and administration process.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1 The most popular methodology used for this analysis is called failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA). 2,3 There are numerous studies, [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] both in the hospital and ambulatory fields, that use proactive risk analysis together with the FMEA methodology to analyze a health care process in details. For example, Cañada Dorado et al 4 described the improvement in the safety of the management of patients with oral anticoagulant therapy in primary care.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk Management in the Ambulatory Care Process in a Mutual Benefit Association Covering Work-Related Accidents and Diseases: Applying Modified Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) Methodology

Grau¹,

Manzanera²,

Orrego

et al. 2018

J Patient Saf

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To assess the impact of different forms of use of failure mode and effect analysis methodology for risk prioritization in the ambulatory care process in a mutual benefit association covering work-related accidents and diseases. Methods:The study is based on a previously drafted and individually prioritized risk map by a multidisciplinary team made up of patient safety committee members from health care centers and clinics in a mutual benefit association covering work-related accidents and diseases. The professionals mainly carry out their work in the field of management (individual manager group (IMG)). A group formed by clinicians subsequently completed 2 prioritizations: one based on the individual opinions of each of the members (individual clinical group (ICG)) and another in a consensual way (consensual clinical group (CCG)) as recommended by failure mode and effect analysis methodology. The risk prioritization was compared in the 3 groups (IMG, ICG, and CCG). Results:The risk prioritization by the IMG defines 7 extreme risks (risk prioritization ≥ 275). When the clinical group prioritizes them in an individual way (ICG), there is no extreme risk, whereas when it does so in a consensual way (CCG), there are 21 extreme risks. With respect to the coincidences of existing causes between the 3 groups, it is noted that the "risk of falls" is rated by both the clinical and the manager group but prioritized differently. On the other hand, the ICG and CCG coincide in that pressure on health care services can contribute to carrying out incomplete anamnesis. They also both consider that internal and external waiting lists and holiday periods can cause a delay in the starting of rehabilitation. The IMG and the CCG show similarity in the risk assessment of overprescribing medication and that multiple computer sessions are initiated. Finally, the IMG and the ICG coincide in the "lack of delivery of the medication leaflet". Conclusions:The point of view of the clinicians is important in the risk prioritization of the ambulatory health care process. The difference in the risk prioritization between the clinical group at individual level and after consensus is remarkable.

show abstract

“…Com base no exposto, uma ferramenta conhecida é a Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA), em português, Análise de Modos de Falha e seus Efeitos (AMFE), que consiste em um instrumento preventivo que reduz os riscos para os usuários de um produto ou serviço, tanto nas fases de projeto, quanto nas etapas de produção [8]. FMEA é um método proativo e sistemático para avalia processos e identificar onde podem falhar, avaliando o impacto de múltiplas falhas, a fim de identificar as partes do processo que devem ser modificadas para antecipar um erro, minimizando seu impacto [9].…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

“…Estados Unidos e, na década de 1960, foi empregada pela National Aeronautics and PUC-Rio -Certificação Digital Nº 1912689/CA Space Administration (NASA) para realizar uma análise preventiva dos potenciais erros envolvidos no projeto Apolo [8] [9]. Na indústria aeroespacial, FMEA pode impedir que um avião tenha defeitos de design ou fabricação, para que não ocorram acidentes devido a defeitos no dispositivo [8]. Em 1972, a empresa Ford introduziu o sistema FMEA na indústria automobilística para melhorar a segurança, produção e o projeto [10].…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Estratégia Híbrida Das Abordagens Quality by Design E Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Para Aplicação No Desenvolvimento De Tecnologia Biomédica

CASTELLANOS¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

El análisis modal de fallos y efectos (AMFE) ayuda a aumentar la seguridad en radioterapia

Cited by 13 publications

References 6 publications

Análisis de la implantación de la acreditación del Joint Acreditation Committee of the International Society for Cellular Therapy and European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation en un programa clínico de trasplante de progenitores hematopoyéticos

Análisis de la implantación de la acreditación del Joint Acreditation Committee of the International Society for Cellular Therapy and European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation en un programa clínico de trasplante de progenitores hematopoyéticos

Risk Management in the Ambulatory Care Process in a Mutual Benefit Association Covering Work-Related Accidents and Diseases: Applying Modified Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) Methodology

Estratégia Híbrida Das Abordagens Quality by Design E Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Para Aplicação No Desenvolvimento De Tecnologia Biomédica

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About