1960
DOI: 10.1016/0029-5582(60)90418-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elastic γ-p scattering at 40 to 70 MeV and polarizability of the proton

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1962
1962
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) and the theoretical estimate (3) and is also close to the proton electric polarizability, n~xp ,,~ 11 [20][21][22][23][24]. According to dispersion theory [12], a small difference a n -c~p ~ 2 can be expected as being due to the nucleon recoil while exciting the pionic cloud of the nucleon by a probe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…(2) and the theoretical estimate (3) and is also close to the proton electric polarizability, n~xp ,,~ 11 [20][21][22][23][24]. According to dispersion theory [12], a small difference a n -c~p ~ 2 can be expected as being due to the nucleon recoil while exciting the pionic cloud of the nucleon by a probe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Separately, polarizabilities of the free proton have been measured in proton Compton scattering experiments performed at photon energies below photo-meson threshold [233][234][235][236][237]. Their results are partly summarized in the review paper [99] and in the Review of Particle Physics 1998 [238] (in fact, the latter reference relies on a "global average" over experiments of 90's derived in [237] on the base of the Baldin-Lapidus sum rule and experimental data on the differential cross section of proton Compton scattering).…”
Section: Status Of the Free Polarizabilities Of The Nucleonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…been determined through photon scattering on the proton and the subsequent use of dispersion relations. The experimental value [17,18] of Ze~2 9 10-4fro 3 is not terribly accurate (and should be redetermined using one of the modern tagged photon beams at an electron accelerator) but after subtracting the calculated [19] diamagnetic contribution -this procedure is also not model independent and hence not free from uncertainties -one obtains a value ZPARA P ~7" 10-4 fm 3.…”
Section: Nucleonic Paramagnetic Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%