ELECTRE methods in prioritized MCDM environment

Yu, Xiaohan; Zhang, Suojuan; Liao, Xianglin; Qi, Xue

doi:10.1016/j.ins.2017.09.061

Cited by 105 publications

(53 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It also facilitates comparisons between alternative schemes by assigning weights to the decision criteria. The outranking relationships between alternatives are constructed and eventually exploited [38,39].…”

Section: Multi-criteria Decision Making: Fuzzy Ahp-electre IIImentioning

confidence: 99%

Study of the Competitiveness of Quanzhou Port on the Belt and Road in China Based on a Fuzzy-AHP and ELECTRE III Model

Gao

Dang

et al. 2018

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:With the establishment of the Belt and Road national strategy, Quanzhou Port is a significant development opportunity. Quanzhou Port is the origin of the 21st century Maritime Silk Road and part of the Belt and Road, but as a pioneer project of the Maritime Silk Road and the main port in the Belt and Road strategy, its development has encountered some challenges and problems. Hence, this paper aims to evaluate the competitiveness of Quanzhou Port based on the criteria selected by experts and corresponding improvement suggestions are put forward for its weaknesses. Using fuzzy-AHP and ELECTRE III, port competitiveness is evaluated according to the total weights obtained based on the different criteria used. The key criteria consist of six factors (port size, port location, hinterland economy, port costs, operations management and growth potential) that are divided into 18 sub-criteria. Five competing ports were selected with respect to geographical proximity. The order of ranking according to ELECTRE III are as follows: Kaohsiung Port, Xiamen Port, Fuzhou Port, Taichug Port and Quanzhou Port. The findings show that the port of Quanzhou appears last in the ordering sequence, resulting in a need for integrative approaches to promote its competitiveness. Compared with competitive ports, Quanzhou Port has relatively weak overall infrastructure and relatively high port costs, which leads to a lack of obvious flow of port materials and a decrease in professional unloading services. Particularly in hinterland port economies, the industrial structure is extensive and backward. Hence, the question of how to achieve a green transformation of the manufacturing industry will be important for Quanzhou Port. This paper points out directions for the future development of Quanzhou Port and applies comprehensive evaluation methods, namely fuzzy-AHP and ELECTRE III.

show abstract

Section: Multi-criteria Decision Making: Fuzzy Ahp-electre IIImentioning

confidence: 99%

Study of the Competitiveness of Quanzhou Port on the Belt and Road in China Based on a Fuzzy-AHP and ELECTRE III Model

Gao

Dang

et al. 2018

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Baseado em este tipo de enfoque é que a metodologia com um Processo Analítico Hierárquico (AHP) ou melhor denominado em sua origem inglesa de Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) (SA-ATY, 1980) se caracteriza como um Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) (YU et al, 2018), caracterizado significativamente no DS. Com este método é possível resolver problemas, melhorar o processo decisório, entender as hierarquias de fluxos informacionais e neste trabalho, compreender e hierarquizar o processo de aumento da reputação digital de organizações, sendo que para isto se valida também as garantias de governanças corporativas e tecnológicas.…”

Section: Design Science E Ahpunclassified

Multicriterial Hierarchy Design for Enhancing Business Competitiveness

Solana-González

Vanti

Seibert

et al. 2018

Proceedings of the 15th CONTECSI International Conference on Information Systems and Technology Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…More recently situations involving incomplete binary relations (some alternatives are not comparable) have been studied see [1]. In the area of Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), Roy [2] proposed an outranking method which leads to incomplete and reflexive binary relations called outranking relations (useful references regarding these methods include [3,4]). These methods have often been criticized for their lack of theoretical foundations.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Characterization of Electre I choice procedures

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper discusses choice procedures that select the set of best alternatives taking into account reﬂexive binary relations (called pseudo tournaments in the paper), such as those that can be obtained when constructing an outranking relation `a' la Electre. The paper contains interesting results which link together the second exploitation step in the Electre I outranking method with two choice procedures (Gocha and Getcha choice procedures also known in the literature as Schwartz set and Smith set respectively). A set of results that characterize some properties of the two outranking methods (ElectI and ElectIP choice procedures) is also presented.

show abstract

ELECTRE methods in prioritized MCDM environment

Cited by 105 publications

References 35 publications

Study of the Competitiveness of Quanzhou Port on the Belt and Road in China Based on a Fuzzy-AHP and ELECTRE III Model

Study of the Competitiveness of Quanzhou Port on the Belt and Road in China Based on a Fuzzy-AHP and ELECTRE III Model

Multicriterial Hierarchy Design for Enhancing Business Competitiveness

Characterization of Electre I choice procedures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About