2008
DOI: 10.30970/cma1.0069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical transport properties and electronic structure of RNiSn compounds (R = Y, Gd, Tb, Dy, and Lu)

Abstract: A series of RNiSn compounds, where R = Y, Gd, Tb, Dy, and Lu, with the TiNiSi structure type (space group Pnma) was synthesized and the electrical transport properties were investigated by means of electrical resistivity and Seebeck coefficient measurements in the temperature range 80-380 K. All of the investigated compounds exhibit metallic-like conductivity. Electronic structure calculations based on the Full Potential Linearized Augmented Plane Wave (FLAPW) method were carried out to obtain the density of s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter two samples show metallic behavior. For LuNiSn, the  value at 380 K is of the order of 1 m, in reasonable agreement with the literature data [29]. For the composite sample, the  value is twice larger, which can be attributed to crystallographic disorder and secondary phase inclusions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The latter two samples show metallic behavior. For LuNiSn, the  value at 380 K is of the order of 1 m, in reasonable agreement with the literature data [29]. For the composite sample, the  value is twice larger, which can be attributed to crystallographic disorder and secondary phase inclusions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The S value near room temperature equals 3.6 µV/K, i.e. significantly differs from that reported before (S  -7.2 µV/K [29]). In the case of LuNiSb, the Seebeck coefficient is positive and S(T) forms a maximum near 600 or 650 K, depending on the sample.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations