2023
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202217601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical‐Mediated Regenerable FeII Active Sites for Efficient Uranium Extraction at Ultra‐Low Cell Voltage

Abstract: Nano‐reduced iron (NRI) is a promising uranium adsorbent due to its strong reducibility and good selectivity, but it still faces the challenges of slow kinetics, limited and non‐renewable active sites. In this work, we realized high efficiency uranium extraction under ultra‐low cell voltage (−0.1 V) in seawater with 20 ppm UO2(NO3)2 solution by coupling electrochemical mediated FeII/FeIII redox and uranium extraction. The adsorption capacity and extraction efficiency of NRI after electrochemical uranium extrac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the original S-NRI, due to the chemical interaction between Fe–OH and UO 2 2+ , the peak position of M–OH bonds after EUE shifted to the direction of low binding energy by about 0.58 eV (Figure c). However, for S-NRI after EUE, the decreased value of M–OH content is far lower than that of NRI, which also indirectly indicates that the Fe–SO 4 2– bond is easier to interact with UO 2 2+ , which can work as main active sites. The Fe 2p XPS spectra for S-NRI were split into three peaks, which were classified as Fe(0), Fe­(II), and Fe­(III), respectively (Figure d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Compared with the original S-NRI, due to the chemical interaction between Fe–OH and UO 2 2+ , the peak position of M–OH bonds after EUE shifted to the direction of low binding energy by about 0.58 eV (Figure c). However, for S-NRI after EUE, the decreased value of M–OH content is far lower than that of NRI, which also indirectly indicates that the Fe–SO 4 2– bond is easier to interact with UO 2 2+ , which can work as main active sites. The Fe 2p XPS spectra for S-NRI were split into three peaks, which were classified as Fe(0), Fe­(II), and Fe­(III), respectively (Figure d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…For S-NRI in a seawater electrolyte with 20 ppm UO 2 (NO 3 ) 2 , the electrochemical method can almost reach adsorption equilibrium in just 3 h, and the extraction efficiency and capacity can reach 90.00% and 357.30 mg/g, respectively. However, for the NRI adsorbent, the extraction efficiency and capacity after 3 h are only 60.00% and 211.70 mg/g, respectively, and reaching adsorption equilibrium also takes 12 h. The faster electrochemical extraction kinetics for S-NRI compared to NRI could be attributed to the stronger interaction between M–SO 4 2– bonds and UO 2 2+ than M–OH bonds . Higher extraction capacity and efficiency for S-NRI could be ascribed to the fact that Fe–SO 4 2– bonds promoted the Fe­(II)/Fe­(III) redox cycle, hastened the electron transfer between Fe­(II) and UO 2 2+ , and promoted the regeneration of Fe­(II) active sites .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations