1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf00615104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrodissolution of synthetic covellite in hydrochloric acid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cheng and Lawson (1991a) showed that the rate of covellite dissolution increased with increasing sulphuric acid concentration up to 0.02 M above which concentration the effect became negligible. In contrast, Ghali and Dandapani (1982) reported that a high concentration of HCl accelerated the anodic dissolution of covellite because of the formation of a CuCl 2 -complex ion.…”
Section: Effect Of Acid Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Cheng and Lawson (1991a) showed that the rate of covellite dissolution increased with increasing sulphuric acid concentration up to 0.02 M above which concentration the effect became negligible. In contrast, Ghali and Dandapani (1982) reported that a high concentration of HCl accelerated the anodic dissolution of covellite because of the formation of a CuCl 2 -complex ion.…”
Section: Effect Of Acid Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It is well known (MacKinnon, 1976;Ghali et al, 1982;Hillrichs and Bertram, 1983;Lee et al, 2008) that the anodic dissolution of covellite is, like chalcopyrite, subject to passivation/retardation in both sulfate and chloride solutions. A comparison of the anodic behaviour of the two minerals therefore could reveal some important similarities that could assist in considerations of the mechanism(s) involved in the passivation process.…”
Section: Comparison With Covellitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…), several alternative processes using mechanochemical, electrochemical and sonochemical treatments have been tested and reported, but they were focused mainly on primary sulfide minerals such as chalcopyrite and chalcocite. In particular, the mechanochemical process has advantages over the others, including no need for additional equipment and procedural simplicity, despite this method had some drawbacks such as agglomeration of fine particles and the relatively lower energy efficiency in the prolonged grinding [17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%