2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2016.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrodynamic two-body problem for prescribed initial data on a straight line

Abstract: Abstract. Due to the finite speed of light, direct electrodynamic interaction between point charges can naturally be described by a system of ordinary differential equations involving delays. As electrodynamics is time-symmetric, these delays appear as time-like retarded as well as advanced arguments in the fundamental equations of motion -the so-called Fokker-Schwarzschild-Tetrode (FST) equations. However, for special initial conditions breaking the time-symmetry, effective equations can be derived which are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(ii) Let furthermore T 0 < −1 be a sufficiently large negative number such that x(t) > y(t) and |ẋ(t)|, |ẏ(t ′ )| < 1 for all t ≤ T 0 and t ′ ≤ T + 0 is fulfilled, and let (a T , b T ) T ≤T 0 denote the family of conditional solutions to the FST equations (1) inferred by Theorem 1 satisfying the initial conditions (4), (5). Then, there is a sequence (T n ) n∈N with lim n→∞ T n = −∞ fulfilling lim…”
Section: Main Results and Its Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(ii) Let furthermore T 0 < −1 be a sufficiently large negative number such that x(t) > y(t) and |ẋ(t)|, |ẏ(t ′ )| < 1 for all t ≤ T 0 and t ′ ≤ T + 0 is fulfilled, and let (a T , b T ) T ≤T 0 denote the family of conditional solutions to the FST equations (1) inferred by Theorem 1 satisfying the initial conditions (4), (5). Then, there is a sequence (T n ) n∈N with lim n→∞ T n = −∞ fulfilling lim…”
Section: Main Results and Its Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before we discuss the proof, we remark that (27) is a corollary to Proposition 2.1 from [5], but (28) is deduced from Lemma 1. This poses no problem since (28) will only be exploited in the proof of the main result Theorem 2, whereas the estimate (27) will be used throughout the proof of Lemma 2.…”
Section: Now We Prove Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations