1992
DOI: 10.1021/la00039a037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrokinetics of the silica-solution interface: a flat plate streaming potential study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

40
229
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 309 publications
(273 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
40
229
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For the theory results, normalized zeta potentials display a nearly linear variation as a function of pH with a slope of 6.5 mV=pH (for pH > 7), comparable to the experimental value of 4-7 mV=pH [106]. Hence, our model can provide a rather good explanation of the measured zeta potential results, which have also been addressed by previous models with varying complexities [116,117]. In Fig.…”
Section: B Variation Of Surface Charge Chemical and Zeta Potentialsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…For the theory results, normalized zeta potentials display a nearly linear variation as a function of pH with a slope of 6.5 mV=pH (for pH > 7), comparable to the experimental value of 4-7 mV=pH [106]. Hence, our model can provide a rather good explanation of the measured zeta potential results, which have also been addressed by previous models with varying complexities [116,117]. In Fig.…”
Section: B Variation Of Surface Charge Chemical and Zeta Potentialsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Despite the expected weaker surface charge, the measured ζ potentials are typically of the same order of magnitude as those observed on hydrophilic surfaces [30]. This could in fact arise from small bare surface potentials and slip-induced amplification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Values for varying from 0.15 to 0.5 have been suggested by various authors (see Hunter 1981;Scales et al 1992;Szymczyk et al 1999). We will assume here a value of 0.3 which is consistent with results of both Sadr et al (2004) and Yao et al (2003).…”
Section: Control Volume Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%