2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromagnetic Navigated Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty—A Five-Year Follow-Up of a Single-Blind Randomized Control Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This prospective study provides long-term follow-up results of a randomised controlled trial comparing navigated and conventional TKA. Previously, we have demonstrated at 5 years after surgery that there was a trend towards a higher revision rate in the conventional TKA cohort [ 4 ]. The ten-year results, however, show that there is no discernible difference in all-cause revision or PROMS between the groups at this time point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This prospective study provides long-term follow-up results of a randomised controlled trial comparing navigated and conventional TKA. Previously, we have demonstrated at 5 years after surgery that there was a trend towards a higher revision rate in the conventional TKA cohort [ 4 ]. The ten-year results, however, show that there is no discernible difference in all-cause revision or PROMS between the groups at this time point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean tourniquet times were longer in the navigation group (80 vs 65 min, p = 0.001). There was no difference in the PROMs at either 1 or 5 years, but there appeared to be a trend in higher revision rate at five years in the conventional group compared to the navigation group (4.9 vs 0%, p = 0.08) [ 4 ]. The aim of this paper is to report the revision rates and PROMs at 10 years, with our hypothesis being that there would be no difference detected between the two interventions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the prostheses reports had any authors from the United States. The countries with the most authors were from the United Kingdom in seven reports, 11,12,23,[30][31][32][33] Japan in four reports, 13,[34][35][36] South Korea in three reports, [14][15][16] and two reports each for both the People's Republic of China 17,18 and the Netherlands. 19,20 There was one report each from Australia, 21 Austria, 22 Canada, 24 Denmark, 25 Germany, 26 India, 27 Singapore, 28 and Turkey (►Table 2).…”
Section: Countries Of Originmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The odds ratio for 30-day mortality for technology-assisted compared with conventional bilateral-simultaneous TKA after adjusting for age, sex, and procedure year was 0.26 (p = 0.02), a significant reduction in mortality 47 . In a single-blinded RCT comparing conventional TKA with electromagnetic computer-navigated TKA, Clark et al found no significant differences in PROMs at the 5-year follow-up 48 . A separate report comparing freehand balancing with sensor-guided balancing at a minimum follow-up of 2 years showed no significant differences in knee range of motion, length of stay, opioid consumption, VAS pain scores, surgical complications, or PROMs.…”
Section: Primary Tkamentioning
confidence: 99%