2015
DOI: 10.1080/01411594.2015.1041951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron–electron interaction and metal–insulator transition in doped semiconductors under intense magnetic fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pentanuclear heterometallic M 5ÀX M 0 X (NIP) 4 frameworks The choice of a M 5 (NIP) 4 framework for our studies was based on several facts such as, it possesses a larger metal node ensemble size with nuclearity ¼ 5, and therefore, the possibility of stronger metal-metal interactions and electron coupling. 49,50 However, the pentanuclear metal cluster resulted in a signicant complication for the second metal with the incorporation. Thus, the main challenge in the case of pentanuclear heterometallic Cu 5ÀX M 0 X (NIP) 4 systems was preservation of framework integrity aer M 0 integration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pentanuclear heterometallic M 5ÀX M 0 X (NIP) 4 frameworks The choice of a M 5 (NIP) 4 framework for our studies was based on several facts such as, it possesses a larger metal node ensemble size with nuclearity ¼ 5, and therefore, the possibility of stronger metal-metal interactions and electron coupling. 49,50 However, the pentanuclear metal cluster resulted in a signicant complication for the second metal with the incorporation. Thus, the main challenge in the case of pentanuclear heterometallic Cu 5ÀX M 0 X (NIP) 4 systems was preservation of framework integrity aer M 0 integration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%