2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.adt.2020.101385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron-impact excitation cross sections for Ar and Ar+ by unitarized distorted-wave approximation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, it is worth to mention that the unitarization of T-Matrix does not necessarily always improve the results near the threshold energy regime. Very recently, Kwon and Cho [20] reported the comparison of the RDW cross sections calculated with unitarized T-matrices with previous RDW results reported by our group on Ar and Ar + [21][22][23]. They reported a comparison of three types of unitarizations: Type I (nonunitarized), Type II, and Type III.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, it is worth to mention that the unitarization of T-Matrix does not necessarily always improve the results near the threshold energy regime. Very recently, Kwon and Cho [20] reported the comparison of the RDW cross sections calculated with unitarized T-matrices with previous RDW results reported by our group on Ar and Ar + [21][22][23]. They reported a comparison of three types of unitarizations: Type I (nonunitarized), Type II, and Type III.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It is also worth mentioning the comparison presented in this study showed our RDW calculation with MCDF wavefunctions showed a reasonable agreement of our RDW cross sections with respective measurements even in low energy regimes. It also reflects the importance of relativistic calculations even for low atomic number atoms such as Argon (Z = 18) [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%