2020
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.102.022801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron-impact excitation of the ( 5s25p ) P1/22

Abstract: Electron-impact excitation of the (5s25p) P1/2 2 →(5s26s) S1/2 2 Electron-impact excitation of the (5s25p) P1/2 2 (5s26s) S1/2 2 transition in indium: Theory and experiment transition in indium: Theory and experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have reported on experimental and theoretical DCS and ICS results for electron-impact excitation of the (4d 10 5s) 2 S1/2 → (4d 9 5s 2 ) 2 D3/2 and (4d 10 5s) 2 S1/2 → (4d 10 6s) 2 S1/2 transitions in silver, and in doing so we have extended the available cross-section database for this scattering system. Neither of those transitions are electric-dipole allowed, so that the corresponding measured scattering intensities were relatively low which in turn led to higher statistical uncertainties than were normally found to be the case [10,11,23]. Nonetheless, all our measured data were observed to be consistently reproducible, to within the stated one standard deviation uncertainties, so that we are confident in their validity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We have reported on experimental and theoretical DCS and ICS results for electron-impact excitation of the (4d 10 5s) 2 S1/2 → (4d 9 5s 2 ) 2 D3/2 and (4d 10 5s) 2 S1/2 → (4d 10 6s) 2 S1/2 transitions in silver, and in doing so we have extended the available cross-section database for this scattering system. Neither of those transitions are electric-dipole allowed, so that the corresponding measured scattering intensities were relatively low which in turn led to higher statistical uncertainties than were normally found to be the case [10,11,23]. Nonetheless, all our measured data were observed to be consistently reproducible, to within the stated one standard deviation uncertainties, so that we are confident in their validity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…3. Indeed this behavior appears to be ubiquitous in electron-metal-vapor scattering, for both the elastic and discrete inelastic channels, with a few examples supporting that assertion being bismuth [22], zinc [21], indium [23], sodium [54], and magnesium [55]. The oscillatory nature of any differential cross section arises from the interference between the various partial waves that describe the collisional behavior.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations