1987
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3700/20/4/021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron impact ionisation of atomic hydrogen at intermediate energies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model was initially developed by Crothers and McCaan for ion-atom collisions [10] and was successfully extended to the light particle impact case. For the intermediate impact energy range, (>150 eV), on the other hand, the CDW-EIS results were close to the Born-CDW results over the set of configurations measured by Ehrhardt et al [11,12]. This showed that the initial state correlation only plays a role as the impact energy decreases.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This model was initially developed by Crothers and McCaan for ion-atom collisions [10] and was successfully extended to the light particle impact case. For the intermediate impact energy range, (>150 eV), on the other hand, the CDW-EIS results were close to the Born-CDW results over the set of configurations measured by Ehrhardt et al [11,12]. This showed that the initial state correlation only plays a role as the impact energy decreases.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Later on, Popov and Erokhin [48] applied this method to (e + , e + e − ) process as a development of the (e,2e) method. Subsequently, Klar and coworkers [32,49] extended this method to include both trajectory and energy shifts as follows:…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the sum of the projectile-core and projectile-electron interactions) in its phase in an approximate way. In the exit channel we have introduced the post collision interaction (PCI) effect, i.e., projectile-ejected electron correlation in the GA (GA-PCI) following the semiclassical method used by Klar et al [32]. On the other hand, BBK method uses an asymptotically exact scattering wave function which involves three appropriate confluent hypergeometric functions depending on the three pairwise inter-particle Coulomb interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lahmam-Bennani et al (1987) find very good agreement between the three methods. Ehrhardt et al (1985Ehrhardt et al ( , 1986, Klar et al (1987), open squares: experimental data of Lohmann et al (1984), solid curve: DWBA (this work), long dashes: coupled pseudostate method (Curran and Walters 1987), short dashes: calculation incorporating the exact three·body boundary condition (Brauner et al 1989). Eo = 250 eV,…”
Section: Normalisation Of Experimental Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%