1991
DOI: 10.1016/0168-1176(91)87010-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron impact total ionization cross-sections for methane, ethane and propane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
52
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
10
52
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2). Again, the data of Nishimura are systematically higher (up to 25%) than those determined by Durić et al [21], especially in the intermediate energy range between 50 eV and 1 keV. This deviation exceeds the reported experimental uncertainties, which were between 10% and 15% for all experimental data.…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 46%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…2). Again, the data of Nishimura are systematically higher (up to 25%) than those determined by Durić et al [21], especially in the intermediate energy range between 50 eV and 1 keV. This deviation exceeds the reported experimental uncertainties, which were between 10% and 15% for all experimental data.…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…Figure 2 shows a selection of ionization cross sections for both molecules. In the case of methane, the BEB model in combination with the molecular orbital data of the NIST database [18,20] reproduces the measured data of Durić et al [21] and Schram et al [22] within the experimental uncertainties. The cross sections measured by Nishimura et al [23], on the other hand, are systematically larger (up to 20% in the energy range between 100 eV and 2 keV) than those predicted by the TABLE I. Electron-impact-ionization cross section data of methane and propane and model functions for an interpolation of cross sections.…”
Section: B Electrons In Propane and Methanementioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Fig. 4, we compare available experimental data [14][15][16][17] with the BEB cross sections using the adiabatic and vertical IPs. It is clear that the agreement between theory and experiment between the threshold and TϽ100 eV is significantly improved by using the vertical IP.…”
Section: Methane (Ch 4 )mentioning
confidence: 99%