2010
DOI: 10.1002/qua.22792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron pair density information measures in atomic systems

Abstract: Shannon entropies of the pair density, conditional entropies, and mutual information are studied in position and in momentum space for ground state neutral atoms and selected excited states at the Hartree-Fock level. We show that the mutual information, a measure of correlation, is larger in position space than in momentum space. This result also holds for a mutual information defined in terms of the exchange density; however, these quantities display much more structure than the corresponding ones based on th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…w αi p i (32) which shows that the weights w αi pi " 2, ..., nq are increasing in both α and i. In the case of…”
Section: Comparative Weights On P 1 P Nmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…w αi p i (32) which shows that the weights w αi pi " 2, ..., nq are increasing in both α and i. In the case of…”
Section: Comparative Weights On P 1 P Nmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A symmetric measure is the so-called Jensen-Shannon divergence (JSD) (e.g., [30][31][32][33]), which can be expressed in terms of the Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) as:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One would expect that an S T derived from a multiconfigurational wave‐function, either an un‐restricted, or CI‐type wave‐function, would result in an S T that would fall between these two bounds: the derived formal bound 3(1 + ln π ) and that upper‐bound defined by STRHF. The position and momentum components of Figure 3 are understood in terms of the localization of the electrons as an increasing function of R , as the Coulombic term begins to dominate. For small R the electrons do not experience each other, with the kinetic energy being dominant; in this region S p > S r . There is a radius R for which S p = S r , but for further subsequent increases in sphere radius R beyond this value, S r > S p . Sagar et al explored the singlet and triplet state members of the Helium isoelectronic series, and see similar behavior of S r , S p as a function of nuclear charge, Z . Specifically, in their work, for small Z , S r > S p . This precedes a transition point for increasing Z where S p = S r (estimated at Z = 2.85), followed by a region wherein S p > S r . [ 50 ] The confining sphere radius, R , in this current work, is equivalent to the attractive nuclear potential, and we see the reciprocal pattern of behavior manifest in the measures of position and momentum Shannon entropy. The onset of S p < 0 in this current work occurs for R ≈ 7 ( a .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Mutual information and the correlation coefficient have been applied to study correlation in quantum systems. [ 3,4,9,10 ] It has also been shown that the interpretations obtained from these two measures are not always consistent. [ 10 ] Transitions between negative and positive values of the correlation coefficient have been shown to be captured by a minimum in the mutual information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%