“…One would expect that an S T derived from a multiconfigurational wave‐function, either an un‐restricted, or CI‐type wave‐function, would result in an S T that would fall between these two bounds: the derived formal bound 3(1 + ln π ) and that upper‐bound defined by The position and momentum components of Figure 3 are understood in terms of the localization of the electrons as an increasing function of R , as the Coulombic term begins to dominate. For small R the electrons do not experience each other, with the kinetic energy being dominant; in this region S p > S r . There is a radius R for which S p = S r , but for further subsequent increases in sphere radius R beyond this value, S r > S p . Sagar et al explored the singlet and triplet state members of the Helium isoelectronic series, and see similar behavior of S r , S p as a function of nuclear charge, Z . Specifically, in their work, for small Z , S r > S p . This precedes a transition point for increasing Z where S p = S r (estimated at Z = 2.85), followed by a region wherein S p > S r . [ 50 ] The confining sphere radius, R , in this current work, is equivalent to the attractive nuclear potential, and we see the reciprocal pattern of behavior manifest in the measures of position and momentum Shannon entropy. The onset of S p < 0 in this current work occurs for R ≈ 7 ( a .…”