Electronic Health Record Challenges, Workarounds, and Solutions Observed in Practices Integrating Behavioral Health and Primary Care

Abstract

Purpose: This article describes the electronic health record (EHR)-related experiences of practices striving to integrate behavioral health and primary care using tailored, evidenced-based strategies from 2012 to 2014; and the challenges, workarounds and initial health information technology (HIT) solutions that emerged during implementation.Methods: This was an observational, cross-case comparative study of 11 diverse practices, including 8 primary care clinics and 3 community mental health centers focused on the implementation of integrated care. Practice characteristics (eg, practice ownership, federal designation, geographic area, provider composition, EHR system, and patient panel characteristics) were collected using a practice information survey and analyzed to report descriptive information. A multidisciplinary team used a grounded theory approach to analyze program documents, field notes from practice observation visits, online diaries, and semistructured interviews.Results: Eight primary care practices used a single EHR and 3 practices used 2 different EHRs, 1 to document behavioral health and 1 to document primary care information. Practices experienced common challenges with their EHRs' capabilities to 1) document and track relevant behavioral health and physical health information, 2) support communication and coordination of care among integrated teams, and 3) exchange information with tablet devices and other EHRs. Practices developed workarounds in response to these challenges: double documentation and duplicate data entry, scanning and transporting documents, reliance on patient or clinician recall for inaccessible EHR information, and use of freestanding tracking systems. As practices gained experience with integration, they began to move beyond workarounds to more permanent HIT solutions ranging in complexity from customized EHR templates, EHR upgrades, and unified EHRs.Conclusion: Integrating behavioral health and primary care further burdens EHRs. Vendors, in cooperation with clinicians, should intentionally design EHR products that support integrated care delivery functions, such as data documentation and reporting to support tracking patients with emotional and behavioral problems over time and settings, integrated teams working from shared care plans, template-driven documentation for common behavioral health conditions such as depression, and improved registry functionality and interoperability. This work will require financial support and cooperative efforts among clinicians, EHR vendors, practice assistance organizations, regulators, standards setters, and workforce educators. (J Am Board Fam Med 2015;28:S63-S72.)

Unintended Consequences: New Problems, New Solutions

“…The best paper authored by Cifuentes et al [19] addresses another widely discussed issue in health informatics. While the EHR may (or may not) deliver its designed benefits to general practices, it often fails to meet the needs of various medical specialties.…”

Strategies to Support the Integration of Behavioral Health and Primary Care: What Have We Learned Thus Far?

“…However, there is perhaps no clinical area in which EHRs have fallen as short on this promise as in integrated care. 22 Practices commonly use separate record systems for behavioral health and medical care, and even those working from the same EHR often restrict access to important behavioral health or primary care information due to HIPAA concerns. This results in clinicians having to use double documentation, scanning, and paper documents to work around these limitations.…”

Integrated Care: Tools, Maps, and Leadership

“…Electronic health records as they currently exist do not facilitate team-based care. 2 Physical space considerations really matter. 3 Staffing ratios and the way clinicians are scheduled determines whether integrated care is even possible.…”