Electronic personnel document management: from legal experiment to practice

The subject. Artificial intelligence is considered as an interdisciplinary legal and psychological phenomenon. The special need to strengthen the psychological component in legal research of artificial intelligence and its introduction into the practice of law enforcement and justice, in particular, is substantiated.The main goal of the study is to confirm or refute hypothesis that AI may be implemented in justice and to substantiate the legal limits of such implementation.The methodology. Based on the comparison of the current legislation, the practice of its application, and other empirical data, internal and external legal and psychological factors of legal regulation and the use of artificial intelligence in jurisprudence and judicial proceed- ings are identified.The main results, scope of application. The analysis of legal and doctrinal definitions of artificial intelligence in jurisprudence has shown that their defining and integral part is relationships that are the result of psychological practices and the subject of psychological science (internal factors). Legal studies of artificial intelligence are based on a psychological conceptual apparatus, all of them legally describe artificial intelligence, first of all, as a psychological phenomenon and build an analogy between the psychology of a living intelligent subject and an inanimate object, humanizing the latter. The federal legislator is also following the path of using the psychological conceptual apparatus. Such categories like human cognitive functions and intellectual activity are applied in Russian Federal Law "On conducting an experiment to establish special regulation in order to create the necessary conditions for the development and implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in the subject of the Russian Federation - the federal city of Moscow and amending Articles 6 and 10 of the Federal Law "On Personal Data". The legal and psychological analysis of the practice of using elements of artificial intelligence in corporate governance, justice, labor relations, social insurance, electoral procedures has been subjected.The conclusion is substantiated that an indispensable condition for the introduction of arti- ficial intelligence and its elements into justice is trust on the part of the disputing parties and the court. Such trust is provided with a real possibility of verifying the actions and decisions made with artificial intelligence by psychologically acceptable and legally formalized methods (external factors). The use of artificial intelligence in law enforcement in general and justice in particular is possible in two directions: (1) solving problems related to the approximation of specialized artificial intelligence systems in legal proceedings to human capabilities and their integration to enhance intelligence; (2) creating artificial intelligence, which is the integration of already created elements of artificial intelligence into a single system capable of participating in justice, but does not have the properties of free will and does not acquire legal personality. Law enforcement using artificial intelligence should comply with the principles enshrined in the European Ethical Charter on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems and their environment, the provisions of which should be implemented in domestic legislation, having previously been revised in accordance with the national legal tradition.

Section: External Legal and Psychological Factors Of Artificial Intel...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Artificial intelligence in justice: legal and psychological aspects of law enforcement

Chucha

2023

“…Вопрос о доступности правосудия возникает и в связи с расширением перечня сведений, которые заявитель должен указать в заявлении, и документов, которые к нему нужно приложить, учитывая, что далеко не всегда заявитель может располагать данными сведениями или возможностью их самостоятельного получения [15]. Так, в литературе описаны проблемы внедряемой системы электронного документооборота на примере трудовых споров [16]. Вопросы оставления искового заявления без движения, а также его возвращения (в том числе по мотивам непредставления доказательств) находятся в «опасной близости» к возможности реализации права на доступ к суду, права на правосудие.…”

unclassified

Appendices to the statement of claim: between demanding and exces-sive condency

Terekhova,

Merenkov

2023

Subject of the research. The article deals with the problems of access to court and violation of the adversarial principle in case of unreasonable decision by the court to leave the claim without movement. The purpose of the research: to determine the nature of possible violations of the principles of access to justice and competitiveness at the time of filing a claim and to identify a way to eliminate violations. Research methods: formal-legal method, anal-ysis, synthesis, formal-logical method.The main results. The procedural and legal consequences of noncompliance with the requirements for a statement of claim is the issuance by the court of a decision to leave the statement without movement, in which it indicates the grounds for this procedural action and the period during which the plaintiff must eliminate the circumstances that served as the basis for leaving the statement of claim statements without movement (part 1 of article 136 of the Civil Рrocedure Code of the Russian Federation). The problem is that an appeal against this ruling is not provided. In cases where the shortcoming of the submitted application is the absence of evidence in the annex to it, which is impossible for the applicant to obtain, the applicant will not be able to comply with the court order or appeal against the ruling issued by the court. In fact, the applicant is deprived of access to the court. In this situation, the plaintiff cannot count on any court assistance in obtaining (reclaiming) the necessary evidence: the court provides assistance in collecting evidence only at the stage of preparing the case for trial, i.e. after the case has been opened. The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation did not see any problems in this situation, because it is impossible to independently appeal the ruling of a court of general jurisdiction on leaving the statement of claim without movement, however, failure to comply with the requirements specified in it is the basis for issuing a ruling on the return of the statement of claim, against which a private complaint can be filed. The paradoxical nature of such a statement that leaving the statement of claim without movement does not prevent the further movement of the case. In our opinion, the problem under discussion would be solved much easier if Article 136 of the Civil Рrocedure Code of the Russian Federation had provided for the obligation of the court to accept the statement of claim, that is, to initiate a civil case after the deadline set by the court for the presentation of evidence, provided that the applicant justifies the impossibility of obtaining requested documents for reasons beyond his control. Then it would be possible for him to receive the assistance provided by law from the side of the court. Otherwise, the person may lose access to the court. Conclusions. The court has the right to point out the shortcomings of the statement of claim, which is carried out by issuing a ruling on leaving the statement of claim without movement, indicating the deadlines for execution. If the plaintiff fails to submit the requested evidence within the time limit set by the court, the court returns the claim to the plaintiff. In this moment the balance in the implementation of the principles of competitiveness and judicial activity is violated. Therefore, it is proposed in this situation to accept the statement of claim after the expiration of the period appointed by the court for the provision of evidence, and to assist the plaintiff in obtaining it.

The mechanism of exercising the employee's right to conclude an employment contract and the formation of its content

Ofman

2024

The subject of the research is the problems of developing an adequate, understandable for the employee and the employer mechanism of exercising the right to conclude an employment contract.The purpose of the scientific article is to confirm the hypothesis that the employment contract in modern conditions is not yet an agreement in its traditional sense, that the defect of will and/or expression of will, which the employee insists on challenging the terms of the employment contract, must be proved by himThe methodology of the study includes a systematic approach, formal-legal and logical interpretation, analysis and synthesis.The main scientific results, conclusions on the achievement of the purpose of the study. Conclusion of the employment contract is a complex, multi-motivated, multi-stage process as from the position of the content and the ways and the limits of the right of the employee and the employer. As a weak party of labor legal relations, the employee agrees to the conditions of the employment contract initiated by the employer under the fear of refusal to conclude the said contract. Using the opportunities of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, employers determine the terms of this contract with minimal risks for themselves, of right, formation of contract content which causes the emergence of numerous lawsuits from employees about the defects of will when entering into labor legal relations, about the illegality of certain terms of the employment contract.The mechanism of concluding a labor contract by its parties, established by the labor legislation, is imperfect, and the process of forming its content is so formal that it does not allow the employee and the employer to reach a real compromise on mandatory and / or additional conditions of the contract. In the article there are proposals aimed at improving the mechanism of exercising by employees and employers of the right to conclude a contract of employment. It seems necessary to amend the Labor Code of the Russian Federation in terms of establishing a special period of appeal of an employee to the court to recognize a particular condition due to a defect of will in the conclusion of the employment contract as illegal (the beginning of the period should be defined as the day of the employment contract, since it is the day on which the employee learned or should have learned about the violation of his right); identified factors that influenced the emergence, evolution of the employee and employer will and deformed it (such factors include Only from the moment the necessary information is provided can the entitled person demand the implementation of the preferences established by labor law.