2011
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/13/6/063002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic structure and band gap of zinc spinel oxides beyond LDA: ZnAl2O4, ZnGa2O4and ZnIn2O4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
69
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
10
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using state-of-the-art G 0 W 0 calculations, we have supported this claim and expect that the experimental band gap should be around 6.55 eV. 22 The HSE06 band gap is in good agreement with the reported G 0 W 0 gap.…”
Section: Electronic Band Structure With Hse06supporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using state-of-the-art G 0 W 0 calculations, we have supported this claim and expect that the experimental band gap should be around 6.55 eV. 22 The HSE06 band gap is in good agreement with the reported G 0 W 0 gap.…”
Section: Electronic Band Structure With Hse06supporting
confidence: 67%
“…[21][22][23] Here, we report the electronic band structure and density of states (DOS) for spinel ZnAl 2 O 4 calculated using the HSE06 functional (see Fig 3). We have used 37.5% mixing of the Hartree-Fock exchange in the HSE06 functional.…”
Section: Electronic Band Structure With Hse06mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Light scattering by residual pores affects both the reflection and the total forward transmission, which are used for calculating the absorption coefficient, particularly in the UV region. On the other hand, the theoretical band gap obtained recently by Dixit et al 18) using first-principle techniques is >6 eV, the value of which is considerably higher than the experimental ones. The high band gap energy may explain the light transmission in the UV region for the transparent ZA obtained by Goldstein et al,10) as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…A similar observation was made for Co(II) doped ZnO, 44,45 an increase is observed for cations such as Al(III) and Ga(III), with a larger mass difference than Zn(II) and Co(II). 46 Considering the literature data for the values of the band gap i.e. α-Fe 2 O 3 with 2.2 eV 47 , ZnO with 3.77 eV 12 or Figure S4, a, b) show different shapes.…”
Section: Specific Surface Area (Ssa) Pore Volume and Average Pore DImentioning
confidence: 97%