2002
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronically enhanced classroom interaction

Abstract: A design rationale for introducing electronic equipment for student interaction in lecture theatres is presented, linking the instructional design to theory. The effectiveness of the equipment for learning depends mostly on what pedagogic method is employed: various alternative types are introduced. Prospective studies are outlined for exploring its use over new ranges of application. Rival views of the concept of interactivity are one way to organise the evaluation of this learning technology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
0
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(6 reference statements)
2
73
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…7 In addition, several researchers 4,11,20 have reported that an ARS enhances traditional lectures by promoting interactivity and initiating discussion. 10 These systems are simply a tool, however, and must be used appropriately to achieve desired results. Interactivity and general learning outcomes are influenced by the instructor's pedagogy and strategic use of the ARS.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 In addition, several researchers 4,11,20 have reported that an ARS enhances traditional lectures by promoting interactivity and initiating discussion. 10 These systems are simply a tool, however, and must be used appropriately to achieve desired results. Interactivity and general learning outcomes are influenced by the instructor's pedagogy and strategic use of the ARS.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Draper, Cargill and Cutts (2002) conclude in their study of clicker implementation, it is possible that this technology allows students to play an active and responsible role in the classroom, and, in so doing, increases their motivation and engagement. It is important to note, however, that while clickers appear in this study to have a significant and positive impact on learning and engagement, it is through thoughtful and purposeful implementation that they are most likely to be effective.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,35 Additionally, LAP improves participation, motivation and understanding, 21,36,37 and lecture topics that are discussed using interactive devices result in students being more engaged, focused and interested. 9,[38][39][40][41] It has been reported that the discussion sparked by LAP is one of its most important benefits, as students prefer to respond individually prior to open group discussion of answers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%