2014
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics6010026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrostatic Charge Effects on Pharmaceutical Aerosol Deposition in Human Nasal–Laryngeal Airways

Abstract: Electrostatic charging occurs in most aerosol generation processes and can significantly influence subsequent particle deposition rates and patterns in the respiratory tract through the image and space forces. The behavior of inhaled aerosols with charge is expected to be most affected in the upper airways, where particles come in close proximity to the narrow turbinate surface, and before charge dissipation occurs as a result of high humidity. The objective of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the dep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previously described airway model of the adult nose-throat region (nasal cavity, pharynx and larynx) based on the nasal cavity of a healthy non-smoking 53-year-old male (weight 73 kg, 173 cm) was used as the adult model [25][26][27]. A model of a small child nose-throat region (nasal cavity, pharynx and larynx) with a volume of * 22.3 cm 3 is based on a scan of a 5-year-old female, and was used as the small child model [28].…”
Section: Anatomical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previously described airway model of the adult nose-throat region (nasal cavity, pharynx and larynx) based on the nasal cavity of a healthy non-smoking 53-year-old male (weight 73 kg, 173 cm) was used as the adult model [25][26][27]. A model of a small child nose-throat region (nasal cavity, pharynx and larynx) with a volume of * 22.3 cm 3 is based on a scan of a 5-year-old female, and was used as the small child model [28].…”
Section: Anatomical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, molecular binding can only explain part of the deposition decrease, while the limited Michaelis–Menten metabolism rate is still the major reason. The influences of tidal breathing [30,31,32], dynamic airways [33,34,35,36], polydisperse aerosols [37,38], hygroscopic growth [39,40,41], electric charges [42,43], and intersubjective variability [44,45,46] on acrolein deposition are also important and should be considered in future studies. Imaging techniques such as phase-contrast MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) with hyperpolarized 3 He can be used to visualize respiratory flows [47,48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have emphasized the influences of tidal breathing (McRobbie & Pritchard, 2005), hygroscopic growth Xi et al, 2013), particle charge effects (Xi, Si, & Longest, 2014), dynamic glottis (Scheinherr et al, 2012), and intersubjective variability (Choi, Tawhai, Hoffman, & Lin, 2009;Xi et al, 2012) on the deposition of respiratory aerosols. Moreover, the respiration rates differ dramatically between rats and humans, e.g., 85 breaths per minute for rats and 12 breaths per minute for human adults (Xi et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%