2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11207-013-0410-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elemental Abundances in the Solar Corona as Measured by the X-ray Solar Monitor Onboard Chandrayaan-1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The X-ray Solar Monitor on Chandrayaan-1 is similar to the SMART-1 XSM except for a reduction in the aperture size to accommodate a wider dynamic range in the expected counts. This instrument measured the X-ray spectrum in the range of approximately 1.8 -20 keV from several X-ray flares during the nine month mission life from 28 November 2008 to 29 August 2009 and the results were presented in Narendranath et al (2014). Narendranath et al (2014).…”
Section: Chandrayaan-1 Xsmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The X-ray Solar Monitor on Chandrayaan-1 is similar to the SMART-1 XSM except for a reduction in the aperture size to accommodate a wider dynamic range in the expected counts. This instrument measured the X-ray spectrum in the range of approximately 1.8 -20 keV from several X-ray flares during the nine month mission life from 28 November 2008 to 29 August 2009 and the results were presented in Narendranath et al (2014). Narendranath et al (2014).…”
Section: Chandrayaan-1 Xsmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stellar coronae also exhibit this effect (Drake, Laming, and Widing, 1997;Laming and Drake, 1999;Garcia-Alvarez et al, 2004) as well as the inverse termed as inverse-FIP (IFIP) effect (see Laming, 2015, for a review). Studies in the past such as those by Feldman (1992), Fludra and Schmelz (1999), Phillips et al (2003), Feldman and Laming (2006), Sylwester et al (2010), Sylwester et al (2012), Schmelz et al (2012), Narendranath et al (2014), Dennis et al (2015) and Moore et al (2018) to name a few, suggest that this deviation or FIP bias is not the same for all elements. The range of reported values in the past, also suggests that FIP bias values may be nominally stable but possibly vary with solar cycle phase (Brooks et al, 2017) and spatial location on the Sun.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Elemental abundances during solar flares have been reported to be coronal or intermediate between the coronal and photospheric values (Sterling et al 1993;Sylwester et al 1998;Fludra & Schmelz 1999;Phillips & Dennis 2012;Narendranath et al 2014;Sylwester et al 2015;Dennis et al 2015). However, it was recently realized that the abundance pattern is different from coronal abundances, in that the boundary between low-FIP and high-FIP elements is about 7 eV (Dennis et al 2015), significantly less than ∼10 eV that is normally observed for solar coronae or solar energetic particles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…From the same mission, Narendranath et al 22 reported elemental abundances in the Solar Corona using the Chandrayaan-1 X-ray Solar monitor. The authors presented abundances of the rock-forming elements, Al, Ca, Mg and Si (as well as Na) and provided a detailed description of analytical techniques, including the derivation of XRF line uxes and the conversion to elemental abundances.…”
Section: Hand-held Mobile On-line Xrf Techniques and Planetary Explmentioning
confidence: 99%