, and the other at the A. N. Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the USSR. This biochemical group was one of the most creative in the country. It was world-renowned because of several important discoveries in the field of nucleic acid studies. In the thirties of the last century, it succeeded in settling the question of the universal occurrence of two known types of nucleic acids, ribonucleic acid (RNA) and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), in living matter. At that time, many biochemists believed that RNA is a characteristic component of plants and fungi, whereas DNA (designated as "thymonucleic acid" or "animal nucleic acid") belongs to the animal kingdom. The presence of DNA in plant cells raised doubts, as the positive cytochemical Feulgen reaction in plant cell nuclei was the only indirect evidence. Belozersky and colleagues were the first to isolate thymine and then DNA (thymonucleic acid) from higher plants (1, 2), thus proving the universal occurrence of DNA. The next series of studies was carried out on bacteria (3) and demonstrated that both RNA and DNA were present there, again confirming the idea of the universality of the occurrence of both types of nucleic acids in organisms of different phylogenetic kingdoms. At the same time, the studies on bacteria showed that these organisms were deserving of special attention because of the high content of nucleic acids in their cells. During the years from 1939 to 1947, the systematic studies of the content of nucleic acids in bacteria of various taxonomic families, of different ages, and under different physiological conditions were performed in both subgroups headed by Belozersky (4). The high level of nucleic acids in cells was postulated to be in direct relation to their biological activities, growth rate, and cell proliferation.I joined the group in 1954 as a graduate student, formally at the Institute of Biochemistry of the Academy of Sciences, but the place of my experimental work was in the well equipped new building of the Biological Faculty at the Moscow State University. By that time, the Journal of Biological Chemistry had published a series of papers by Chargaff and colleagues in which the first convincing results that the base composition of nucleic acids can vary in different organisms were presented (5-8). Crick and Watson had just published their famous papers on DNA structure and its implications for gene duplication and transcription into RNA (9, 10). The following questions had arisen. What is the range of variations of base compositions of DNA and RNA in different organisms? Does the total RNA just copy the total DNA of the cell, thus repeating its base composition, or do DNA-independent fractions of RNA exist? In 1956, I started work on testing the idea of the presumable correlation between the base compositions of RNA and DNA. The result was unexpected: the total DNA base composition manifested wide species variations, whereas the RNA composition was found to be surprisingly conserved (11). At the same time, statistical an...