Embedding third sector psychology services within the probation environment: an alternative to MHTRs

Fowler, J. Christopher; Price, Robyn Catherine; Burger, Kirsty; Mattei, Alice Jennifer; McCarthy, Ashley Mary; Lowe, F.R.; Sathiyaseelan, Thuthirna

doi:10.1108/jcp-04-2019-0013

Cited by 4 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, we identified four outcome studies (Callender, 2021; Fowler et al, 2020; Long et al, 2018; Newbury-Birch et al, 2014). Three of these papers relate to the use of Mental Health Treatment Requirements (MHTRs), which can be recommended by the courts, but despite the high prevalence of mental illness in the probation population have rarely been used.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Second, Fowler et al (2020) conducted a follow-up to this pilot after a full service had been commissioned. The K6 replaced the K10 as the initial screening tool, and the referral route was extended so that Probation Officers could directly refer those scoring 13+ to the service, rather than needing an MHTR to be recommended by the court.…”

Section: Outcome Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Identifying mental illness and monitoring mental health in probation service settings

Brooker

Sirdifield

Parkhouse

2022

European Journal of Probation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is a need to improve a) identification and monitoring of people with mental illness on probation and b) understanding of the impact of interventions on mental health outcomes for the probation population. If data were routinely collected using validated screening tools and shared between agencies, this could inform practice and commissioning decisions, and ultimately it could improve health outcomes for people under supervision. The literature was reviewed to identify brief screening tools and outcome measures that have been used in prevalence and outcome studies conducted with adults on probation in Europe. This paper shares findings from the UK-based studies in which 20 brief screening tools and measures were identified. Recommendations are made based on this literature regarding suitable tools for use in probation to routinely identify a need for contact with mental health and/or substance misuse services and to measure change in mental health outcomes.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Outcome Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identifying mental illness and monitoring mental health in probation service settings

Brooker

Sirdifield

Parkhouse

2022

European Journal of Probation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In a unique study by Fowler et al (2019), all clients supervised by the Probation Service in London, were screened at assessment stage for mental health problems. A subgroup of 569 clients were identified and referred onwards to a specialist mental health service.…”

Section: International Experiencementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Fowler et al (2019) reported that a key issue related to client engagement with Mental Health Services was instability of housing/accommodation. This is consistent with Maslow’s theory of hierarchy of need (Maslow, 1943).…”

Section: International Experiencementioning

confidence: 99%

“…It appears that there are additional factors which may impact on or influence client engagement with Services for mental health support. Fowler et al (2019) reported that a key issue related to client engagement with Mental Health Services was instability of housing/accommodation. This is consistent with Maslow's theory of hierarchy of need (Maslow, 1943).…”

Section: International Experiencementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Mental health and probation supervision in Ireland

Power¹,

McNally

2022

European Journal of Probation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 2019, three internal studies were conducted in the Irish Probation Service exploring mental health among persons subject to probation supervision. This paper briefly considers, as context for the studies, the Irish and wider international literature exploring mental health problems among those engaged with probation services and outlines the key findings from the three studies. The studies though limited in scale, scope and methodology were consistent in identifying recurring themes supporting the broader research literature highlighting the prevalence of mental health problems among probation service clients. The paper discusses the key findings and implications for probation policy and practice, and looks to ongoing developments and related new initiatives in the field in Ireland.

show abstract

Forensic mental health assessments of juvenile misdemeanor cases involving demoralization (status offenses) and delinquency

Rode,

Kabzińska,

Rode

et al. 2023

JCP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The role of evidence-based psychological knowledge in cases of juvenile offending is essential to make appropriate decisions relating to youth who violate legal or social norms, as it carries implications for treatment, intervention and practice. Psychological expert opinions therefore need to meet high formal and methodological requirements while maintaining ethical standards. The purpose of this study is to investigate psychological expert opinions in cases of juvenile misbehavior reported to regional courts in Poland. Juvenile court proceedings concern cases of demoralization and/or delinquent offenses. Demoralization is a legal concept described in the Act of June 9, 2022 on juvenile support and resocialization. This concept was not defined; it was only described through examples of behaviors indicating demoralization. These include the following: violations of the principles of community life; evading compulsory education or schooling; use of alcohol, narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, their precursors, substitutes or new psychoactive substances; and prostitution. Design/methodology/approach To reach these goals, court records of juvenile cases in six district courts (N = 253) were gathered and analyzed. A semistructured questionnaire was used to examine the cases in which psychologists were appointed and to analyze the procedures used by these experts for assessing adolescents and their families. Findings Findings revealed that family judges appoint psychologists both in cases of “demoralization” (i.e. status offenses) and in cases of juvenile delinquency. The opinions were delivered by psychologists who were mostly members of diagnostic teams. Results indicate that such opinions generally comply with the minimal standards recommended by the Ministry of Justice, yet a few problems were observed with the determination of levels of demoralization. Originality/value The limitations of diagnostic tools used by psychologists are discussed, and recommendations for future practice are provided.

show abstract

Embedding third sector psychology services within the probation environment: an alternative to MHTRs

Cited by 4 publications

References 26 publications

Identifying mental illness and monitoring mental health in probation service settings

Identifying mental illness and monitoring mental health in probation service settings

Mental health and probation supervision in Ireland

Forensic mental health assessments of juvenile misdemeanor cases involving demoralization (status offenses) and delinquency

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About