2007
DOI: 10.1089/adt.2007.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emerging Concepts of Guanine Nucleotide-Binding Protein-Coupled Receptor (GPCR) Function and Implications for High Throughput Screening

Abstract: Guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein) coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise one of the largest families of proteins in the human genome and are a target for 40% of all approved drugs. GPCRs have unique structural motifs that allow them to interact with a wide and diverse series of extracellular ligands, as well as intracellular proteins, G proteins, receptor activity-modifying proteins, arrestins, and indeed other receptors. This distinctive structure has led to numerous efforts to discover drugs against… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 181 publications
1
74
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…2 and 3). This is in agreement with our previous observation that M35 and M40 behave as full agonists in a calcium flux assay performed on the same receptor (data not shown) and with the agonistic properties of the same two peptides at both GAL 1 and GAL 2 receptors. 27 We also examined NOP receptor antagonists J113397 and UFP-101.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…2 and 3). This is in agreement with our previous observation that M35 and M40 behave as full agonists in a calcium flux assay performed on the same receptor (data not shown) and with the agonistic properties of the same two peptides at both GAL 1 and GAL 2 receptors. 27 We also examined NOP receptor antagonists J113397 and UFP-101.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In assays with significant amplification, such as second-messenger assays (e.g., cAMP formation), both full and partial agonists can reach the same maximal response (Fig. 1A), whereas in assays with little amplification, such as assays that monitor recruitment of ␤-arrestin to a receptor by enzyme complementation (Eglen et al, 2007), partial agonists have significantly lower maximal responses than full agonists (Rajagopal et al, 2010) (Fig. 1B).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification of SM drugs with allosteric mechanisms of action came about primarily with the increasing use of functional screening assays, 96,97 but it is becoming increasingly evident that antibodies can also exhibit such modulatory effects.…”
Section: Orthosteric Versus Allosteric Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%