2021
DOI: 10.1136/jech-2021-216713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emerging directions in the study of the environmental determinants of mental health: commentary on the MINDMAP Project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies had used subjectively defined, self-reported measures of living environment or perceptions of it. Advantages of objectively measured, standardized metrics of density include robustness in the exposure-outcome effect estimates and greater replicability and comparability between studies …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some studies had used subjectively defined, self-reported measures of living environment or perceptions of it. Advantages of objectively measured, standardized metrics of density include robustness in the exposure-outcome effect estimates and greater replicability and comparability between studies …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advantages of objectively measured, standardized metrics of density include robustness in the exposure-outcome effect estimates and greater replicability and comparability between studies. 34,35 The limitations of our study stem from an observational design that precludes establishing causality. Nonetheless, longitudinal analyses over 2 time points enabled examinations of the associations of multiscalar housing environments with depression after rigorous adjustments.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%