Emotion and motor preparation: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study of corticospinal motor tract excitability

Influence of Emotion on the Control of Low-Level Force Production

“…The current findings, therefore, demonstrate that although low, moderate, and high tone levels may rely on varying neural circuits (Ehrsson et al, 2001;Spraker et al, 2007), the effect of emotion on these circuits remains fundamentally similar. Emotion leads to an increase in excitability of the motor system, which is reflected in increased force output relative to force production under neutral or benign conditions (Coombes et al, 2008;Coombes, Tandonnet et al, 2009;Hajcak et al, 2007;van Loon et al, 2010). Moreover, recent work (i.e., Naugle, Coombes, & Janelle, 2010) has demonstrated that the effect of emotion on sustained force production maybe altered as a function of the relative force levels required on consecutive trials.…”

“…Also, there is no evidence that pairing emotion and motor processes alters the typical pattern of emotional reactivity demonstrated when passively viewing emotional images (Coombes, Janelle, & Duley, 2005;Schmidt et at., 2009). Future research efforts are needed to (a) qualify these findings in healthy and clinical samples across the lifespan (Christou et al, 2004), (b) investigate the cortical and subcortical neural circuits that underlie the interaction between emotion and movement (Borsook, 2007;Coombes, Tandonnet et al, 2009;Hajcak et al, 2007;Pessiglione et al, 2007;Schmidt et al, 2009;van Loon et al, 2010), and (c) examine the implications of emotion-induced changes in movement in a variety of performance settings (Woodman et al, 2009). In conclusion, wexposure to emotional images impacts the accuracy but not variability of a sustained low-level force contraction.…”

“…To address these questions, we replicated a previously used emotion and force control paradigm but set the target force to a low (i.e., 2% of MVC) rather than a moderate (10% of MVC) level (Coombes et al, 2008). If arousing emotional images increase motor system excitability (Coombes, Tandonnet et al, 2009;Hajcak et al, 2007: van Loon, van den Wildenberg, van Stegeren, Hajcak, & Ridderinkhof, 2010, we should see a relative increase in force production for pleasant and unpleasant images as compared to neutral images. Force is known to decay once visual feedback has been removed; therefore, the best index of such an increase would be the magnitude of the directional bias of force production, as indexed by constant error.…”

Emotion-dependent responses in spinal cord neurons: A spinal fMRI study

“…Substantial data indicate that the left amygdala shows greater, or more consistent, activation in response to fear-relevant stimuli than does the right amygdala (see [Baas et al, 2004] and [Zald, 2003], for reviews). The same stimuli that elicit amygdalar responses also activate the corticospinal tract ( [Coelho et al, 2010], [Coombes et al, 2009], [Hajcak et al, 2007], [Schutter et al, 2008] and [van Loon et al, 2010]). The corticospinal tract originates in the primary motor cortex, the fibers cross to the other side of the body at the level of the medulla, and travel down the spinal cord in the lateral corticospinal tract to synapse in the ventral horn in the appropriate spinal cord segment.…”

“…Subsequent studies have extended this network to include descending white-matter pathways connecting the cortex to the brainstem and spinal cord. Schutter et al (2008; see also [Coombes et al, 2009] and [van Loon et al, 2010]) demonstrated that photographs of faces expressing fear elicited greater excitability in the corticospinal tract than did faces expressing happiness or no emotion (i.e., neutral faces). Similar corticospinal excitability has been detected in response to negative emotional scenes (Coelho et al, 2010).…”