Empirical Study of the Relationship between Board of Director Mechanisms and Perceived Performance of Listed Firms in Nigeria

Abstract

Purpose: The growing debate on the board of director mechanisms to firm performance will for a long time remain area of research. The effectiveness of the board of director composition, responsibility, and accountability have become an area of research in the recent trend. This paper attempts to investigate the empirical study of the relationship between the board of director mechanisms and perceived performance of listed firms in Nigeria. The underpinning theory of the paper is rooted in agency theory and supported by resource dependence theory, and stewardship theory to increase the understanding of the influence of the board of director formation to perceived firm performance. The questionnaires were administered to the respondents, out of 182 questionnaires administered, 117 were returned. The number of valid questionnaires is 114. The data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Empirical findings showed that board of director composition and accountability were positively associated with perceived firm performance. While the board of director responsibility has no relationship. Based on the knowledge of this paper, this is the first study that adopts the use of primary data to investigate the empirical study of the relationship between the board of director mechanisms and perceived performance of listed firms in Nigeria. The findings provide policymakers, stakeholders, and government with the approaches to overcome and resolved the conflict of interest between the board of director (agent) and shareholder (principal). The paper also offers some suggestions for future study.

Entrepreneurial Leadership, Performance, and Sustainability of Micro-Enterprises in Malaysia

“…Moreover, most cited literature appears to indicate a significantly positive effect of the identified dimensions found in entrepreneurial leadership (i.e., responsibility, accountability, analytical thinking, and emotional intelligence) on an enterprise's performance cf. [34][35][36]38,43,44,[53][54][55]67,68]. At the same time, the existing literature suggests a significantly positive relationship between enterprise performance and sustainability [74,75].…”

“…This result is in agreement with prior studies cf. [43,92], therefore indicating that accountability is a crucial determinant that promotes not only the performance but also the sustainability of every firm. As for analytical thinking, this study discovered a significantly positive effect on micro-enterprise sustainability owned by low-income household heads in Kelantan, Malaysia.…”

“…Similarly, Tan and Kao [42] noted that accountability has an impact upon work performance. Empirically, Nuhu and Hussani [43] discovered that the accountability and composition exhibited by directors have a positive impact upon perceived enterprise performance. Moreover, based on prior studies, accountability can be regarded as a crucial determinant in promoting performance in firms [44,45].…”

Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Financial Performance: A Systematic Literature Review in Emerging Markets

“…The roles and responsibilities of the Board of Directors are crucial for effective corporate governance. Nuhu and ssani Nuhu & Hussani (2017) emphasize the importance of the board having clearly defined roles to enhance directors' effectiveness in carrying out their fiduciary responsibilities. Moreover, the expertise and networks of the board of directors significantly impact environmental performance and governance mechanisms within a firm (Homroy & Slechten, 2016).…”