2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12355-020-00931-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EMS-Based In Vitro Mutagenesis and Mutant Screening for Smut Resistance with Agronomic Traits in Sugarcane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Srivastava et al, [21] identified RAPD marker linked to powdery mildew resistant gene(s) in black gram. The mutants in present study has been evaluated for smut resistance in filed for two years artificial inoculation trial and TC 906 and TC 2826 were reported to be resistant for smut [1,2]. Thus the distinct molecular fingerprinting patterns with these mutants open up new ways providing stable genetic differences for analyzing the resistance and susceptibility of sugarcane genotypes with the RAPD technique.…”
Section: Primer Selectionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Srivastava et al, [21] identified RAPD marker linked to powdery mildew resistant gene(s) in black gram. The mutants in present study has been evaluated for smut resistance in filed for two years artificial inoculation trial and TC 906 and TC 2826 were reported to be resistant for smut [1,2]. Thus the distinct molecular fingerprinting patterns with these mutants open up new ways providing stable genetic differences for analyzing the resistance and susceptibility of sugarcane genotypes with the RAPD technique.…”
Section: Primer Selectionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Due to the merits of CoC 671 in-vitro mutagenesis and somaclonal variation was attempted by various researchers to rectify the defective agronomic traits in it [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] and two varieties as CoM 94012 and VSI 434 have been released by proving CoC 671 by somaclonal variation but none was having smut resistance in them. Dalvi et al [1,2] in the field following standard agronomic practices. The leaf samples for extraction of DNA were collected during the harvest at the 12 th month period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, this mutagen has achieved satisfactory results in the breeding of Fusarium-head-blight-resistant wheat plant (Chhabra et al 2021) and smut-resistant sugarcane strains (Dalvi et al 2021). 0.175% EMS also induced blast-resistant clones in rice varieties (Rakshit 2010).…”
Section: Effects Of Ems and Mesa Treatments On Blast Resistance In Th...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutants TC 2819 and TC 2826 exhibited superior for sucrose content (20-24%) than parent CoC 671 (18-21%), respectively, at 10 th and 12 th month of maturity. Their study concluded that EMSinduced genetic variability for the mutants with smut resistance and agronomic traits in sugarcane [120].…”
Section: Chemical Mutagenesismentioning
confidence: 99%