1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0801(199912)13:8<543::aid-bmc925>3.0.co;2-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enantiomer-specific high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection of methamphetamines in abusers' hair and urine

Abstract: Enantiomer‐specific high‐performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection using 4‐(4,5‐diphenyl‐1H‐imidazol‐2‐yl)‐benzoyl chloride as a fluorescence labeling reagent was applied to determine methamphetamine and its metabolites in abusers’ hair and urine. Hair samples were segmentally analyzed based on 1 cm long segments. In four hair samples, only the S(+)‐enantiomers of methamphetamine and its N‐demethylated metabolite, S(+)‐amphetamine were detected. Satisfactory correlation (r = 0.901) between … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For chiral analysis of a compound, MS analysis is generally powerless, because both enantiomers of a target compound give almost the same mass spectra; it is essential to completely separate the enantiomers by chromatography. Although chromatographic separation of enantiomers by HPLC has been reported [1], the Table 1 Validation data for enantiomers of amphetamines spiked into human urine measured by the present high throughput gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method number of theoretical plates is much higher in GC analysis than in HPLC analysis. For chiral analysis of a drug, GC-MS seems much more advantageous than liquid chromatography (LC)-MS (-MS), because of the above higher separation ability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For chiral analysis of a compound, MS analysis is generally powerless, because both enantiomers of a target compound give almost the same mass spectra; it is essential to completely separate the enantiomers by chromatography. Although chromatographic separation of enantiomers by HPLC has been reported [1], the Table 1 Validation data for enantiomers of amphetamines spiked into human urine measured by the present high throughput gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method number of theoretical plates is much higher in GC analysis than in HPLC analysis. For chiral analysis of a drug, GC-MS seems much more advantageous than liquid chromatography (LC)-MS (-MS), because of the above higher separation ability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Chiral analyses of amphetamine-type stimulants (ATSs) in human samples have been widely performed, utilizing high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [1], capillary electrophoresis [2], and gas chromatographymass spectrometry (GC-MS) [3]. The importance of such analysis has increased in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereupon, HPLC-FL methods using DIB-Cl for the chiral quantification of MP and AP in urine and hair were developed. [65][66][67] The enantioseparation of DIB-labels was achieved on a Chiralcel OD-RH column with a mixture of acetonitrile and phosphate-citrate buffer containing NaPF6 as a mobile phase. Chiral analyses of MP and AP by using urine samples collected from a patient who received selegiline as an anti-Parkinson's disease medicament and from suspected MP abusers were performed.…”
Section: ·1 Chiral Analysis Of Abusable Drugs 65-68mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enantioselective determination procedures in hair specimens have mainly been described for methadone and its main metabolite [121][122][123] as well as for amphetamine, methamphetamine and designer amphetamines [124][125][126][127][128]. Together with the development of novel enantioselective procedures the enantioselective determination of special analytes in hair specimens opens up the possibility to conduct further research, e.g.…”
Section: Enantioselective Hair Testing Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%