2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-018-2118-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Encompassing new use cases - level 3.0 of the HUPO-PSI format for molecular interactions

Abstract: BackgroundSystems biologists study interaction data to understand the behaviour of whole cell systems, and their environment, at a molecular level. In order to effectively achieve this goal, it is critical that researchers have high quality interaction datasets available to them, in a standard data format, and also a suite of tools with which to analyse such data and form experimentally testable hypotheses from them. The PSI-MI XML standard interchange format was initially published in 2004, and expanded in 20… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, most of the collected interactions derive from large-scale experiments or text mining import, result in an urgent need for sets of gold standard interactions, manually curated from the literature. Appropriate standards and data formats to enable this are supplied by the HUPO PSI-MI data exchange formats and associated controlled vocabulary [81].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, most of the collected interactions derive from large-scale experiments or text mining import, result in an urgent need for sets of gold standard interactions, manually curated from the literature. Appropriate standards and data formats to enable this are supplied by the HUPO PSI-MI data exchange formats and associated controlled vocabulary [81].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IntAct has in fact expanded its remit to molecular entities other than proteins, including both genes and non-coding RNAs, and now features over 42,000 interactions involving some form of nucleic acid. The well-established PSI-MI-XML 2.5 data format enables the capture of molecular features relevant to the binding, such as post-transcriptional and translational modifications, mutations, regions involved in the interaction and so on, that are not captured in other ncRNA databases [80][81][82]. Although only experimental evidences of physical associations are annotated in IntAct and indirect causal relations are not included in this repository, annotated regulatory networks are automatically integrated with the huge amount of protein interaction data already collected.…”
Section: Predicted Rna-rna Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MINT, together with IntAct (Orchard et al, 2014) and the Database of Interacting Proteins (DIP; Salwinski et al, 2004), is a founder and active member of the IMEx consortium, whose purpose is to coordinate curation efforts between its members in order to make available a unified, non-redundant, and standardized molecular interaction dataset. The IMEx Consortium adopts the PSI-MI standard formats (Sivade Dumousseau et al, 2018) to export molecular interaction data. In 2013, MINT and IntAct merged their efforts in order to create a unified resource, optimize reduced developer resources, and increase curation productivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to the "reproducibility crisis" in science [21], novel projects focus on setting up formal structures for data management with collaborations between domain experts [22][23][24]. For instance, the description of molecular interactions has been formalized by the Human Proteome Organization (HUPO) PSI-MI community [25], leading to standard guidelines (MIMIx [26]), exchange formats (PSI-MI TAB [7], PSI-MI XML [27]), and CVs (PSI-MI CV [28]). These standards are adopted by biological databases (e.g., IntAct [14], the IMEx Consortium [29], SIGNOR [4,15], Reactome [30]), and researchers are called upon to describe their data following these standards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%