2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.09.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endodontic Working Length Measurement Using Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Images Obtained at Different Voxel Sizes and Field of Views, Periapical Radiography, and Apex Locator: A Comparative Ex Vivo Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
1
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
33
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Another possible clinical application of the CBCT modality is the three-dimensional visualization of the dental root canal. Yilmaz et al [8] concluded that CBCT image sequences with less than 300 µm voxel size can be used for determining the working length during an endodontic treatment of a human mandibular premolar tooth. Nonetheless Acar et al [3] found no correlation by comparing the CBCT and micro-CT image sequences of 41 human primary first and second molars regarding the detectability of an accessory canal and stated that CBCT is not reliable for depicting the internal anatomy of a root canal system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another possible clinical application of the CBCT modality is the three-dimensional visualization of the dental root canal. Yilmaz et al [8] concluded that CBCT image sequences with less than 300 µm voxel size can be used for determining the working length during an endodontic treatment of a human mandibular premolar tooth. Nonetheless Acar et al [3] found no correlation by comparing the CBCT and micro-CT image sequences of 41 human primary first and second molars regarding the detectability of an accessory canal and stated that CBCT is not reliable for depicting the internal anatomy of a root canal system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous publications have been investigated the use of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for evaluating small anatomical structures in dentistry e.g. root canal morphology in endodontics [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] or bone quality assessment in maxillofacial surgery [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. It is essential to visualize these details to set up the proper diagnosis and treatment plan, hence clinicians need to select the adequate imaging technique with the appropriate resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 Yakın zamanda rapor edilen çalışma boyu tespitinde KIBT ve periapikal radyografinin doğruluğunun elektronik apex bulucuyla karşılaştırıldığı bir çalışmada, farklı görüntüleme alanı ve voksel boyutlarında tespit edilen çalışma boylarının, periapikal radyografilerle tespit edilen çalışma boylarına kıyasla daha doğru olduğu görülmüştür. 37 Endodontik amaçlı olarak kullanılan KIBT cihazları küçük görüntüleme alanına sahip ünitelerdir ve bu nedenle daha büyük görüntüleme alanlı olanlara göre hasta daha az radyasyona neden maruz kalmaktadır. 38 Genellikle, teknik faktörler, bölge ve cihaz özelliklerine bağlı olarak KIBT dozları 19-122 μSv arasında değişmektedir.…”
Section: Tepeklinikunclassified
“…Electromagnetic waves released from electronic devices can disrupt the operation of these devices―an effect known as electromagnetic interference [10]. Accurate determination of working length is clinically very important when performing root canal treatment [11]. The electronic apex locator and periapical radiography are convenient tools to determine root canal working length in routine clinical practice [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate determination of working length is clinically very important when performing root canal treatment [11]. The electronic apex locator and periapical radiography are convenient tools to determine root canal working length in routine clinical practice [11,12]. The electronic apex locators are useful adjuncts in determining working length during endodontic therapy, with a reported accuracy of up to 93% [13], which is higher than radiography [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%