2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2011.01183.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Using a Cap‐fitted Panendoscope as a Diagnostic Procedure in a Case of Scirrhous Gastric Carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to EUS-FNA, boring biopsy is another option. Other options include biopsy of the lesion after exposing deep layers via endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap (EMRC) [ 8 ] or submucosal dissection [ 9 ] and biopsy of the lesion after laparoscopically exposing the serosa. [ 10 ] A search for studies on histopathological diagnosis via deep biopsy of advanced gastric LP in PubMed since 2000 determined that EUS-FNA, boring biopsy, boring biopsy after mucosal dissection, biopsy of the lesion after exposing deep layers via EMRC and submucosal dissection, and biopsy of the lesion after laparoscopically exposing the serosa were used in 2, 5, 19, 1, and 1 studies, respectively (Table 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to EUS-FNA, boring biopsy is another option. Other options include biopsy of the lesion after exposing deep layers via endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap (EMRC) [ 8 ] or submucosal dissection [ 9 ] and biopsy of the lesion after laparoscopically exposing the serosa. [ 10 ] A search for studies on histopathological diagnosis via deep biopsy of advanced gastric LP in PubMed since 2000 determined that EUS-FNA, boring biopsy, boring biopsy after mucosal dissection, biopsy of the lesion after exposing deep layers via EMRC and submucosal dissection, and biopsy of the lesion after laparoscopically exposing the serosa were used in 2, 5, 19, 1, and 1 studies, respectively (Table 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since missed diagnosis adversely affects the treatment and prognosis of patients, the development of diagnostic modalities other than the conventional endoscopic biopsy is warranted. To date, several alternative diagnostic techniques, such as percutaneous fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy [16,17], endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) [18,19], endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) [20], and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided FNA biopsy [21][22][23] have been described in case reports and a small number of case series. However, there is no universal consensus on alternative approaches for GLP diagnosis in patients with negative standard endoscopic biopsy results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%