Endoscopic mucosal resection with a circumferential incision in the removal of colon neoplasms. Results of a randomized trial.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to compare the immediate and long-term results of endoscopic mucosal resection with a circular incision (C-EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the treatment of patients with large benign epithelial neoplasms of the colon.PATIENTS AND METHODS: a prospective randomized comparative study was conducted from November 2020 to July 2022, included 103 patients with benign epithelial neoplasms of the colon ranging in size from 20 to 30 mm. The C-EMR method was used in 52, ESD - 51 patients.RESULTS: the removal of the tumor by the C-EMR method required statistically significantly less time, compared with the ESD method – 30 and 60 minutes, respectively (p<0.001). Intra- and postoperative complications occurred in 13(23.7%) patients in the C-EMR group and in 12(23.5%) patients in the ESD group. The most frequently reported complication was postcoagulation syndrome in the main and control groups – in 9(17.3%) and 11(21.6%) cases, respectively. It was found that the difficult location of the tumor (OR=18.3; p=0.01) and intraoperative complications (OR =37.5; p=0.04) are independent conversion factors of endoscopic intervention. The frequency of tumor removal in a en bloc and achievement of negative resection margins (R0) in the main and control groups did not significantly differ – 47(90.4%) and 49(96.1%) (p=0.4) and 40(76.9%) and 45(88.2%) (p=0.2), respectively.CONCLUSION: endoscopic mucosal resection with a circumferential incision is an effective and safe operation comparable to endoscopic submucosal dissection, and can be the method of choice for benign epithelial neoplasms of the colon with sizes from 20 to 30 mm. In addition, the duration of the operation using the C-EMR method is two times less than using ESD.